http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-12031978
Nigel Evans, Conservative MP for Ribble Valley and deputy Speaker of the House of Commons, has revealed that he is gay.
He is the 22nd MP to come out of the closet.
It has always been harder for Conservative politicians than those from other parties to admit openly that they are homosexual, given the Tories' continual promoting of traditional family values.
However, in 2010, times and attitudes have changed.
We now live in an age where couples are able to have their relationships recognised in law by entering into a Civil Partnership. Being gay is no big deal.
Mr Evans is to be applauded for helping to continue the Tories' march into the twenty-first century.
Sunday 19 December 2010
Cameron Invites Unions To Number 10
http://www.talktalk.co.uk/news/pa/uknews/2010/12/20/prime-minister-to-meet-union-bosses.html
David Cameron is to have a formal meeting with Union leaders in Downing Street, it has been announced.
The last time such a meeting between a Tory PM and Union bosses took place was in 1985 when the then-TUC general secretary Norman Willis, met Margaret Thatcher.
The two sides will meet amid growing concern about impending job losses and spending cuts in the public sector.
However, with the Tories so intent on reducing the budget deficit by cutting spending at such a fast pace, it is difficult to see what the Unions will gain from meeting with Mr Cameron.
I don't see how they will be able to change the government's mind on pursuing this course of action.
David Cameron is to have a formal meeting with Union leaders in Downing Street, it has been announced.
The last time such a meeting between a Tory PM and Union bosses took place was in 1985 when the then-TUC general secretary Norman Willis, met Margaret Thatcher.
The two sides will meet amid growing concern about impending job losses and spending cuts in the public sector.
However, with the Tories so intent on reducing the budget deficit by cutting spending at such a fast pace, it is difficult to see what the Unions will gain from meeting with Mr Cameron.
I don't see how they will be able to change the government's mind on pursuing this course of action.
Coalition In Disarray Over Tuition Fees
As expected, the Coalition succeeded in getting its highly controversial increase in tuition fees through Parliament.
However, this was only possible with the Conservatives' junior partners being split three ways on this issue, with most voting in favour but a significant number - including former leaders Charles Kennedy and Menzies Campbell - opposing the new legislation and others abstaining as is their right under the Coalition agreement.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has admitted that it was a mistake to come out so against a rise in tuition fees during the 2010 election campaign. But this has come too late to repair his damaged reputation.
Nobody willl trust a word he says again and the Lib Dems will no doubt take a real battering in next year's local elections.
However, this was only possible with the Conservatives' junior partners being split three ways on this issue, with most voting in favour but a significant number - including former leaders Charles Kennedy and Menzies Campbell - opposing the new legislation and others abstaining as is their right under the Coalition agreement.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has admitted that it was a mistake to come out so against a rise in tuition fees during the 2010 election campaign. But this has come too late to repair his damaged reputation.
Nobody willl trust a word he says again and the Lib Dems will no doubt take a real battering in next year's local elections.
Wednesday 8 December 2010
Ed Miliband Exploits Coalition Disunity Over Tuition Fees at PMQs
http://www.labourlist.org/pmqs-liveblog-december-8th?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=109929+PMQs+verdict%3A+Ed+proves+himself+-+again+%2F+Re-organising+society+Tory+style+%2F+A+government+loss+of+real+significance+%28LL503%29&tmtid=109929-10130-10130-162-12-590-57452
Ed Miliband was back to his best at PMQs this week after a lacklustre performance last week.
He set out to exploit the splits amongst the Liberal Democrats over the now- explosive issue of increasing student tuition fees.
And he succeeded.
The Prime Minister's woeful swipe at Mr Miliband that he was like a 'student politician' saw the Labour leader seize his chance to hit below the belt. He replied with the jibe that the PM 'hangs out with people who wreck restaurants' - a reference to the Bullingdon Club.
David Cameron was clearly rattled.
The Coalition faces its biggest test yet, with the Liberal Democrats split three ways on the issue. Some, including the Party leader, Nick Clegg will vote in favour and, following key meetings today, it now looks as if all Liberal Democrat ministers will follow suit.
Others will abstain as is their right set out in the Coalition agreement.
But we have already seen many high profile Lib Dem figures, including former leaders Charles Kennedy and Menzies Campbell, say they will vote against the proposals.
And the disquiet is also evident on the Conservative benches, with senior Tories, like former Party Leadership candidate David Davis, also declaring his intention to vote against the controversial policy.
To make matters worse, Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has been quoted as branding the policy a 'shambles'.
So what now for the Coailition?
It seems likely that they will win the crucial Commons vote on Thursday as the rebellion amongst disaffected MPs from both parties is clearly not enough to overturn the new proposals.
But what is absolutely obvious is that the furore created by this issue has done enormous damage to the Liberal Democrats, who campaigned so passionately against any rise in tuition fees during the general election.
I wonder whether the splits in the Party that have now appeared can be repaired during the life time of this Parliament.
Ed Miliband was back to his best at PMQs this week after a lacklustre performance last week.
He set out to exploit the splits amongst the Liberal Democrats over the now- explosive issue of increasing student tuition fees.
And he succeeded.
The Prime Minister's woeful swipe at Mr Miliband that he was like a 'student politician' saw the Labour leader seize his chance to hit below the belt. He replied with the jibe that the PM 'hangs out with people who wreck restaurants' - a reference to the Bullingdon Club.
David Cameron was clearly rattled.
The Coalition faces its biggest test yet, with the Liberal Democrats split three ways on the issue. Some, including the Party leader, Nick Clegg will vote in favour and, following key meetings today, it now looks as if all Liberal Democrat ministers will follow suit.
Others will abstain as is their right set out in the Coalition agreement.
But we have already seen many high profile Lib Dem figures, including former leaders Charles Kennedy and Menzies Campbell, say they will vote against the proposals.
And the disquiet is also evident on the Conservative benches, with senior Tories, like former Party Leadership candidate David Davis, also declaring his intention to vote against the controversial policy.
To make matters worse, Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has been quoted as branding the policy a 'shambles'.
So what now for the Coailition?
It seems likely that they will win the crucial Commons vote on Thursday as the rebellion amongst disaffected MPs from both parties is clearly not enough to overturn the new proposals.
But what is absolutely obvious is that the furore created by this issue has done enormous damage to the Liberal Democrats, who campaigned so passionately against any rise in tuition fees during the general election.
I wonder whether the splits in the Party that have now appeared can be repaired during the life time of this Parliament.
Wednesday 24 November 2010
Lord Young Quits Advisor Role In We've 'Never Had It So Good' Row
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11798366
Lord Young's comments that the British people have 'never had it so good' have, not suprisingly, provoked a storm of protest from all quarters of the political arena.
And quite rightly, the former Cabinet minister, appointed as the Prime Minister's Enterprise advisor just last month, has very quickly seen the error of his words and resigned.
Labour leader Ed Milliband branded the Government as completely out of touch with ordinary people. And the Unite union called the remarks 'Thatcherite Claptrap'.
It is a chilling reminder of comments that were made in the previous Tory administration that 'unemployment was a price worth paying'.
It is yet another example of the Prime Minister enlisting the experience of millionaire ministers from another era who are totally divorced from the realities of economic hardship that many people are currently having to face.
Lord Young's comments that the British people have 'never had it so good' have, not suprisingly, provoked a storm of protest from all quarters of the political arena.
And quite rightly, the former Cabinet minister, appointed as the Prime Minister's Enterprise advisor just last month, has very quickly seen the error of his words and resigned.
Labour leader Ed Milliband branded the Government as completely out of touch with ordinary people. And the Unite union called the remarks 'Thatcherite Claptrap'.
It is a chilling reminder of comments that were made in the previous Tory administration that 'unemployment was a price worth paying'.
It is yet another example of the Prime Minister enlisting the experience of millionaire ministers from another era who are totally divorced from the realities of economic hardship that many people are currently having to face.
Tuesday 16 November 2010
Common Sense Prevails As PM Reverses Photographer Appointment
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11764138
It has been announced that the Prime Minister has decided against employing a photographer and film maker at the tax-payers' expense.
David Cameron has recently come under a barrage of criticism for previously deciding on this move, largely seen as an unnecessary expense at a time when the Coalition are engaging in a program of huge cuts in public spending and have endlessly lectured the British people on the need to tighten their belts.
Common sense has eventually and quite rightly, prevailed.
But it reflects very badly on Mr Cameron and the Coalition to have even thought that such appointments were acceptable in the first place.
It shows how out of touch the Prime Minister and his Cabinet of millionaires are with the needs of ordinary people who struggle every day to make ends meet.
It has been announced that the Prime Minister has decided against employing a photographer and film maker at the tax-payers' expense.
David Cameron has recently come under a barrage of criticism for previously deciding on this move, largely seen as an unnecessary expense at a time when the Coalition are engaging in a program of huge cuts in public spending and have endlessly lectured the British people on the need to tighten their belts.
Common sense has eventually and quite rightly, prevailed.
But it reflects very badly on Mr Cameron and the Coalition to have even thought that such appointments were acceptable in the first place.
It shows how out of touch the Prime Minister and his Cabinet of millionaires are with the needs of ordinary people who struggle every day to make ends meet.
Tuesday 9 November 2010
Criticism Of Harriet Harman Over Woolas Affair Is Unwarranted
http://www.labourlist.org/i-agree-with-harriet-too---woolas-had-to-go
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11719438
Labour's deputy leader, Harriet Harman is facing a barrage of criticism today over her comments effectively disowning expelled MP Phil Woolas.
Mr Woolas has been barred from politics for three years after making false statements about a rival candidate in the vote for his parliamentary seat during the recent general election. This in clear breach of the 1983 Representation of the People Act.
I believe, along with many readers of the Party's online bulletin Labour List, that the anger this episode has raised amongst many Labour MPs, is unfair.
I can understand the concerns raised by both Conservative and Labour MPs in the Commons yesterday that a hastily-convened election court having the final say over whether an MP should be removed and barred from office sets a very difficult precedent. There has not been a case like this for 99 years and these matters should where possible, be decided by the electorate.
However, this a case where an MP has been elected on the back of telling lies about other election candidates. Therefore Mr Woolas should not be allowed to remain in office, no matter how many fellow MPs may support him.
Harriet Harman is, in my view, absolutely right.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11719438
Labour's deputy leader, Harriet Harman is facing a barrage of criticism today over her comments effectively disowning expelled MP Phil Woolas.
Mr Woolas has been barred from politics for three years after making false statements about a rival candidate in the vote for his parliamentary seat during the recent general election. This in clear breach of the 1983 Representation of the People Act.
I believe, along with many readers of the Party's online bulletin Labour List, that the anger this episode has raised amongst many Labour MPs, is unfair.
I can understand the concerns raised by both Conservative and Labour MPs in the Commons yesterday that a hastily-convened election court having the final say over whether an MP should be removed and barred from office sets a very difficult precedent. There has not been a case like this for 99 years and these matters should where possible, be decided by the electorate.
However, this a case where an MP has been elected on the back of telling lies about other election candidates. Therefore Mr Woolas should not be allowed to remain in office, no matter how many fellow MPs may support him.
Harriet Harman is, in my view, absolutely right.
Monday 8 November 2010
Coalition Work Activity Scheme More Punitive Than Beneficial
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11706545
The Coalition will this week unveil its plans to get the long-term jobless back into work.
Under the new scheme, benefit-claimants will be forced undertake manual work. If they refuse, they could lose their £65 a week Jobseekers Allowance for up to three months.
It is the government's attempt to force the 'work-shy' - those who are happy to just live off their state hand-outs and are making no effort at all to find work - to get into the routine of a typical working day. The move is also designed to stop people from claiming benefit whilst working 'on the side'.
For the Coalition, Danny Alexander stressed that the aim of the scheme was not to 'punish or humiliate' but to get the unemployed into the habit of working.
Labour and leading Church figures have criticised the scheme, saying that it does nothing to actually create new jobs.
Labour's Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman, speaking on Sunday's The Andrew Marr Show, quite rightly pointed out, that for this sort of scheme to succeed, there had to be the jobs available. With an average of five people chasing every vacancy, getting the long-term unemployed into meaningful employment, will be an extremely tall order.
I have to agree.
I find myself really questioning the purpose of the Coalition's plans here. Yes, on one level, getting the long-term jobless out of the house and accustomed to a structured daily routine is clearly a positive step. But, such a programme will only be of real benefit if it allows for the acquiring of a wide variety of skills to equip them for the workplace. And more important, participants in the scheme will not be at all motivated if there is no guaranteed job at the end of it.
Whilst most people will agree with the Work Activity Scheme in principle, the Coalition's approach to the problem of tackling long-term unemployment appears to be much too punitive and in the long-term may be of little benefit to those it is meant to help.
The Coalition will this week unveil its plans to get the long-term jobless back into work.
Under the new scheme, benefit-claimants will be forced undertake manual work. If they refuse, they could lose their £65 a week Jobseekers Allowance for up to three months.
It is the government's attempt to force the 'work-shy' - those who are happy to just live off their state hand-outs and are making no effort at all to find work - to get into the routine of a typical working day. The move is also designed to stop people from claiming benefit whilst working 'on the side'.
For the Coalition, Danny Alexander stressed that the aim of the scheme was not to 'punish or humiliate' but to get the unemployed into the habit of working.
Labour and leading Church figures have criticised the scheme, saying that it does nothing to actually create new jobs.
Labour's Deputy Leader, Harriet Harman, speaking on Sunday's The Andrew Marr Show, quite rightly pointed out, that for this sort of scheme to succeed, there had to be the jobs available. With an average of five people chasing every vacancy, getting the long-term unemployed into meaningful employment, will be an extremely tall order.
I have to agree.
I find myself really questioning the purpose of the Coalition's plans here. Yes, on one level, getting the long-term jobless out of the house and accustomed to a structured daily routine is clearly a positive step. But, such a programme will only be of real benefit if it allows for the acquiring of a wide variety of skills to equip them for the workplace. And more important, participants in the scheme will not be at all motivated if there is no guaranteed job at the end of it.
Whilst most people will agree with the Work Activity Scheme in principle, the Coalition's approach to the problem of tackling long-term unemployment appears to be much too punitive and in the long-term may be of little benefit to those it is meant to help.
Saturday 6 November 2010
Pressure Mounts On Cameron Aide Coulson
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11703766
It has emerged that Andy Coulson, David Cameron's Communications Director, has been interviewed by police regarding the interception of phone-messages, during his time at The News of the World.
The claims relate to as many as 3000 messages being intercepted, including those of MPs. And there are now calls for a judicial review to allow for the names of those whose phones were tapped to be made public.
Mr Coulson has denied all the allegations, but they just will not go away.
The spotlight is now clearly on the Prime Minister, who must surely now question the wisdom of keeping Mr Coulson in his post.
Following his appointment of a personal film-maker and photographer, at the tax-payers' expense, Mr Cameron's reputation for poor judgement is fast becoming an embarrasment.
It has emerged that Andy Coulson, David Cameron's Communications Director, has been interviewed by police regarding the interception of phone-messages, during his time at The News of the World.
The claims relate to as many as 3000 messages being intercepted, including those of MPs. And there are now calls for a judicial review to allow for the names of those whose phones were tapped to be made public.
Mr Coulson has denied all the allegations, but they just will not go away.
The spotlight is now clearly on the Prime Minister, who must surely now question the wisdom of keeping Mr Coulson in his post.
Following his appointment of a personal film-maker and photographer, at the tax-payers' expense, Mr Cameron's reputation for poor judgement is fast becoming an embarrasment.
Wednesday 3 November 2010
Cameron's Spending Exposed In Photographers Appointment Row
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11685442
The Prime Minister has appointed both a photographer and film-maker, with both their salaries coming out of the civil service payroll.
Labour Leader, Ed Miliband used Prime Minister's Questions to take a swipe at Mr Cameron's decision:
"The Prime Minister.. I cannot believe that he is talking about hard choices this week, because whom has he chosen to put on the civil service payroll this week? His own personal photographer. There is good news for the Prime Minister—apparently he does a nice line in airbrushing. You can picture the scene, Mr Speaker, of the Cabinet photo: “We’re all in this together; just a little bit more to the right, Nick.” Let me ask the Prime Minister in all seriousness, is it really a wise judgment when he is telling everybody to tighten their belts to put his own personal photographer on the civil service payroll?"
This was another excellent performance at PMQs by Mr Miliband; exposing the sheer hypocracy of a Prime Minister who has recently overseen unprecendented cuts to public spending. He has repeatedly told the country to the point of ad nauseam that Labour has left the UK's finances in such a mess that future generations will be paying for their mistakes for years to come.
And yet he is allowing taxpayers to foot the bill for his own photographer's services.
Well, as the saying goes, 'Do as I say, not as I do....'
The Prime Minister has appointed both a photographer and film-maker, with both their salaries coming out of the civil service payroll.
Labour Leader, Ed Miliband used Prime Minister's Questions to take a swipe at Mr Cameron's decision:
"The Prime Minister.. I cannot believe that he is talking about hard choices this week, because whom has he chosen to put on the civil service payroll this week? His own personal photographer. There is good news for the Prime Minister—apparently he does a nice line in airbrushing. You can picture the scene, Mr Speaker, of the Cabinet photo: “We’re all in this together; just a little bit more to the right, Nick.” Let me ask the Prime Minister in all seriousness, is it really a wise judgment when he is telling everybody to tighten their belts to put his own personal photographer on the civil service payroll?"
This was another excellent performance at PMQs by Mr Miliband; exposing the sheer hypocracy of a Prime Minister who has recently overseen unprecendented cuts to public spending. He has repeatedly told the country to the point of ad nauseam that Labour has left the UK's finances in such a mess that future generations will be paying for their mistakes for years to come.
And yet he is allowing taxpayers to foot the bill for his own photographer's services.
Well, as the saying goes, 'Do as I say, not as I do....'
Student Tuition-Fee Hike Will Have Far-Reaching Consequences
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11677862
The decision to raise university student tuition fees will have enormous repercussions.
Students face a huge rise in annual tuition costs, with the fees increasing from the current level of £3290, to anything from £6-9000.
Labour's universities spokesman, Gareth Thomas, described the move as a tragedy, with the poorer students in the UK being forced to pick courses on the basis of cost, rather than the course that they actually want.
What is most worrying is that because of the cuts to spending on the arts announced in last month's Spending Review, the funding of many degree courses in the arts, humanities and other related subjects will now be almost completely reliant on student fees alone.
This will mean that a wider choice of degree subjects will be available to those students able to afford them, with many colleges being forced to charge the maximum fee of £9000 to ensure adequate funding of the courses on offer.
Despite Coalition reassurances that those universities charging closest to the maximum fee will have to give financial assistance to those students who need it, the prospect of a two-tier system is clearly looming large.
The memory of all those Liberal Democrat MPs pledging during the election to oppose any rise in tuition fees is now a very distant one.
The decision to raise university student tuition fees will have enormous repercussions.
Students face a huge rise in annual tuition costs, with the fees increasing from the current level of £3290, to anything from £6-9000.
Labour's universities spokesman, Gareth Thomas, described the move as a tragedy, with the poorer students in the UK being forced to pick courses on the basis of cost, rather than the course that they actually want.
What is most worrying is that because of the cuts to spending on the arts announced in last month's Spending Review, the funding of many degree courses in the arts, humanities and other related subjects will now be almost completely reliant on student fees alone.
This will mean that a wider choice of degree subjects will be available to those students able to afford them, with many colleges being forced to charge the maximum fee of £9000 to ensure adequate funding of the courses on offer.
Despite Coalition reassurances that those universities charging closest to the maximum fee will have to give financial assistance to those students who need it, the prospect of a two-tier system is clearly looming large.
The memory of all those Liberal Democrat MPs pledging during the election to oppose any rise in tuition fees is now a very distant one.
Monday 1 November 2010
Harman's 'Ginger Rodent' Jibe Does Labour No Favours
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-11658228
Labour's deputy leader, Harriet Harman has sparked fury by launching a personal attack on the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander.
In her speech to the Scottish Labour Party Conference she referred to the red-haired Liberal Democrat Cabinet minister as a 'ginger rodent'.
Clearly this was a major blunder on the part of Ms Harman, not to mention her speech-writers.
I was not impressed at all.
The coalition government are on the back-foot at the moment, following the announcement of huge cuts to public expenditure in the recent Spending Review. They know that once the cuts start to bite, they will be very unpopular.
I wanted to see coverage of Labour's promised new policy announcements at the Scottish Conference. Instead the media, predictably, seized on Ms Harman's gaffe and it became the story of the weekend. Not surprisingly, she was forced to telephone Mr Alexander to personally apologise for her remarks.
It is extremely disappointing to see an experienced ex-cabinet minister with not only 13 years experience of government - but also an acute awareness of what many years of being stuck on the Opposition benches is like - behaving in this way.
This is the last thing that Labour needs at the moment.
I have raised the point on one of my earlier blogposts that I feel that Harriet Harman should have stepped down as Deputy leader at the same time of Gordon Brown's resignation. This just reinforces my view that a totally fresh leadership team was needed.
However, the Party is invigourated following the election of Ed Miliband as leader and his very promising start, especially in PMQs. They are also ahead in the polls for the first time in three years.
It is vital that the Party continues to focus on being a strong opposition and convincing the electorate that they are ready to return to power in five years time and are not detracted from this path by ridiculous personal jibes at the opposition from the leadership.
Labour's deputy leader, Harriet Harman has sparked fury by launching a personal attack on the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander.
In her speech to the Scottish Labour Party Conference she referred to the red-haired Liberal Democrat Cabinet minister as a 'ginger rodent'.
Clearly this was a major blunder on the part of Ms Harman, not to mention her speech-writers.
I was not impressed at all.
The coalition government are on the back-foot at the moment, following the announcement of huge cuts to public expenditure in the recent Spending Review. They know that once the cuts start to bite, they will be very unpopular.
I wanted to see coverage of Labour's promised new policy announcements at the Scottish Conference. Instead the media, predictably, seized on Ms Harman's gaffe and it became the story of the weekend. Not surprisingly, she was forced to telephone Mr Alexander to personally apologise for her remarks.
It is extremely disappointing to see an experienced ex-cabinet minister with not only 13 years experience of government - but also an acute awareness of what many years of being stuck on the Opposition benches is like - behaving in this way.
This is the last thing that Labour needs at the moment.
I have raised the point on one of my earlier blogposts that I feel that Harriet Harman should have stepped down as Deputy leader at the same time of Gordon Brown's resignation. This just reinforces my view that a totally fresh leadership team was needed.
However, the Party is invigourated following the election of Ed Miliband as leader and his very promising start, especially in PMQs. They are also ahead in the polls for the first time in three years.
It is vital that the Party continues to focus on being a strong opposition and convincing the electorate that they are ready to return to power in five years time and are not detracted from this path by ridiculous personal jibes at the opposition from the leadership.
Saturday 30 October 2010
Coalition's Distorted Message On Housing Benefit Goes Unchallenged In The Media
http://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/10/conjuring-camerons-cap-trick/
Many sections of the press have inaccurately reported the Coalition's plans for changes to Housing Benefit.
What has not been put across accurately in most of the media is that the £20,000 cap on Housing Benefit for some families is only one of nine new measures being introduced and that this one change only accounts for 3% of the £2bn that has been set aside for Housing Benefit cuts.
In fact these cuts will only save £65m of what is needed.
What is significant is how many publications have reported the £20,000 cap as the 'Key Change'
Even the leftwing New Statesman has jumped on the bandwagon, saying: 'In London, where rents are significantly higher than in the rest of the country, the £400-a-week cap will force as many as 82,000 families out of the capital – the largest population movement since the Second World War'
The point to be made here is that it is not just this measure alone that will have this effect, it is all the nine changes together that will lead to 82,000 people possibly having to leave London. This is according to research carried out by London Councils. In reality, only 17,000 people could lose their homes; as a result of reductions to the Local Housing Allowance.
So, basically placing a £20,000 cap on Housing Benefit will not actually contribute very much to bringing the overall budget deficit down.
To me, what is so alarming is how the majority of the media - even those elements not traditionally Tory supporters - have been lured in to a cynical trap set by the Coalition and focussed their attention - and their headlines - entirely on one aspect of the proposals soon to be put before Parliament.
The media are clearly misleading the country on this issue.
And yet, Cameron, Clegg and the rest of the Coalition are happy to sit back and let them do it.
Many sections of the press have inaccurately reported the Coalition's plans for changes to Housing Benefit.
What has not been put across accurately in most of the media is that the £20,000 cap on Housing Benefit for some families is only one of nine new measures being introduced and that this one change only accounts for 3% of the £2bn that has been set aside for Housing Benefit cuts.
In fact these cuts will only save £65m of what is needed.
What is significant is how many publications have reported the £20,000 cap as the 'Key Change'
Even the leftwing New Statesman has jumped on the bandwagon, saying: 'In London, where rents are significantly higher than in the rest of the country, the £400-a-week cap will force as many as 82,000 families out of the capital – the largest population movement since the Second World War'
The point to be made here is that it is not just this measure alone that will have this effect, it is all the nine changes together that will lead to 82,000 people possibly having to leave London. This is according to research carried out by London Councils. In reality, only 17,000 people could lose their homes; as a result of reductions to the Local Housing Allowance.
So, basically placing a £20,000 cap on Housing Benefit will not actually contribute very much to bringing the overall budget deficit down.
To me, what is so alarming is how the majority of the media - even those elements not traditionally Tory supporters - have been lured in to a cynical trap set by the Coalition and focussed their attention - and their headlines - entirely on one aspect of the proposals soon to be put before Parliament.
The media are clearly misleading the country on this issue.
And yet, Cameron, Clegg and the rest of the Coalition are happy to sit back and let them do it.
Friday 29 October 2010
Child Benefit Changes Branded Uninforceable As Well As Unfair.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11649453
The Coalition's much-maligned changes to Child Benefit have privately been deemed as unworkable by Treasury officials.
The Treasury have said that fines will be issued to parents who fail to declare their full earnings.
However, despite the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander dismissing such reports as nonsense, is believed that some civil servants believe that because claimants are under no obligation to declare Child Benefit, the changes recently announced affecting higher-rate tax payers will be very difficult to police.
Reports suggest that some in the Treasury think the plans are simply unworkable and will eventually be abandoned.
And Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson said the row about the plans was "what you get when you stumble in, incompetently, into interfering with a universal benefit".
These proposals have been a disaster right from the start, beginning with the botched announcement at the Tory Conference and the revelations of how unfair they will be on single-parent households.
They really expose the inefficiency of a highly-incompetant government.
The Coalition's much-maligned changes to Child Benefit have privately been deemed as unworkable by Treasury officials.
The Treasury have said that fines will be issued to parents who fail to declare their full earnings.
However, despite the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander dismissing such reports as nonsense, is believed that some civil servants believe that because claimants are under no obligation to declare Child Benefit, the changes recently announced affecting higher-rate tax payers will be very difficult to police.
Reports suggest that some in the Treasury think the plans are simply unworkable and will eventually be abandoned.
And Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson said the row about the plans was "what you get when you stumble in, incompetently, into interfering with a universal benefit".
These proposals have been a disaster right from the start, beginning with the botched announcement at the Tory Conference and the revelations of how unfair they will be on single-parent households.
They really expose the inefficiency of a highly-incompetant government.
Wednesday 27 October 2010
PM Sticks To His Guns On Housing Benefit Changes As Miliband Attacks Policy Shambles
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11633163
Despite earlier reassuring MPs that legislation would not be rushed through on this issues, the Prime Minister insisted that plans to change Housing Benefit would not be scrapped.
At a stormy PMQs, Labour Leader Ed Miliband accused the Coalition of introducing measures that would leave thousands of people at risk of losing their homes and called the policy a 'shambles'.
Despite his show of public defiance, Mr Cameron and some of his ministerial colleagues have privately conceded that many people will have to leave their homes as a result of the changes being proposed.
So much for the Prime Minister's promises during the election to protect the vulnerable and most needy.
Despite earlier reassuring MPs that legislation would not be rushed through on this issues, the Prime Minister insisted that plans to change Housing Benefit would not be scrapped.
At a stormy PMQs, Labour Leader Ed Miliband accused the Coalition of introducing measures that would leave thousands of people at risk of losing their homes and called the policy a 'shambles'.
Despite his show of public defiance, Mr Cameron and some of his ministerial colleagues have privately conceded that many people will have to leave their homes as a result of the changes being proposed.
So much for the Prime Minister's promises during the election to protect the vulnerable and most needy.
Coalition In Disarray Over Plans To Cap Housing Benefit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11633163
Planned changes to Housing Benefit appear to be in chaos today.
A Coalition spokesperson was swift to deny that they are planning to back down over plans to cap payments at £400 for a four-bedroom home.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is clearly under pressure from both Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs to re-think the idea, which many believe will drive those seeking work out of big cities because of high living-costs.
And the Secretary of State is facing further criticism over fears that the changes could be hurriedly implemented without primary legislation.
MPs were today seeking a meeting with Mr Duncan-Smith determined to force a vote on the issue. And quite rightly too - this is legislation that will fundamentally affect people's daily lives.
Of particular concern to MPs was the plan to remove the benefit safety-net for those under 35 suffering from a mental illness as such a move would force them out of their own homes into shared accomodation.
Do the Government really think that they can push through such important changes without a proper debate in Parliament?
Ministers are showing that they are not just arrogant but that they hold the electorate in complete contempt.
Planned changes to Housing Benefit appear to be in chaos today.
A Coalition spokesperson was swift to deny that they are planning to back down over plans to cap payments at £400 for a four-bedroom home.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith is clearly under pressure from both Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs to re-think the idea, which many believe will drive those seeking work out of big cities because of high living-costs.
And the Secretary of State is facing further criticism over fears that the changes could be hurriedly implemented without primary legislation.
MPs were today seeking a meeting with Mr Duncan-Smith determined to force a vote on the issue. And quite rightly too - this is legislation that will fundamentally affect people's daily lives.
Of particular concern to MPs was the plan to remove the benefit safety-net for those under 35 suffering from a mental illness as such a move would force them out of their own homes into shared accomodation.
Do the Government really think that they can push through such important changes without a proper debate in Parliament?
Ministers are showing that they are not just arrogant but that they hold the electorate in complete contempt.
Tuesday 26 October 2010
Labour Repeat Warning That Spending Cuts Could Damage Recovery
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11627746
The Chancellor, George Osborne, was upbeat today following the release of new figures showing that the economy is continuing to grow steadily.
However Labour were quick to point out that these statistics proved that their strategy of continuing to invest in the economy during their last months of power was continuing to bear fruit and any forthcoming spending cuts would reverse this.
Shadow Chancellor, Alan Johnson expressed deep concern that Government plans to cut one million jobs would put enormous strain on the private sector, as these positions would not necessarily be replaced.
I'd say it is highly likely that any increase in growth and the accompanying optimism now is bound to be replaced by a huge drop in productivity followed by a long period of recession and deep economic hardship.
The Chancellor, George Osborne, was upbeat today following the release of new figures showing that the economy is continuing to grow steadily.
However Labour were quick to point out that these statistics proved that their strategy of continuing to invest in the economy during their last months of power was continuing to bear fruit and any forthcoming spending cuts would reverse this.
Shadow Chancellor, Alan Johnson expressed deep concern that Government plans to cut one million jobs would put enormous strain on the private sector, as these positions would not necessarily be replaced.
I'd say it is highly likely that any increase in growth and the accompanying optimism now is bound to be replaced by a huge drop in productivity followed by a long period of recession and deep economic hardship.
Hughes Signals Lib Dems May Vote Against Housing Benefit Reforms
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11616741
The Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Simon Hughes, has given a clear warning that his party may not allow the Coalition's changes to Housing Benefit through Parliament.
After just a few months of power, Mr Hughes and many of his fellow MPs are clearly deeply unhappy with a number of proposals agreed with the Conservatives. In particular, he singled out the proposal to cut benefits to the long-term unemployed after twelve months.
For Labour, Douglas Alexander was quick to appeal to disaffected Lib Dems to join forces with them and vote down the new measures. As he as pointed out, if their own deputy leader is uneasy about the changes, then this does bode well for the future of the deal with the Conservatives and the Coalition.
The Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, Simon Hughes, has given a clear warning that his party may not allow the Coalition's changes to Housing Benefit through Parliament.
After just a few months of power, Mr Hughes and many of his fellow MPs are clearly deeply unhappy with a number of proposals agreed with the Conservatives. In particular, he singled out the proposal to cut benefits to the long-term unemployed after twelve months.
For Labour, Douglas Alexander was quick to appeal to disaffected Lib Dems to join forces with them and vote down the new measures. As he as pointed out, if their own deputy leader is uneasy about the changes, then this does bode well for the future of the deal with the Conservatives and the Coalition.
Sunday 24 October 2010
Coalition To Reject Browne Report On Tuition Fees
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11615212
The Coalition government appears to have rejected the recommedations of Lord Browne to scrap any cap on student tuition fees.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg confirmed this in an interview today.
No doubt many Liberal Democrat MPs are vehemently opposed to the move, which would effectively mean the creation of a two-tier higher education system.
The Coalition government appears to have rejected the recommedations of Lord Browne to scrap any cap on student tuition fees.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg confirmed this in an interview today.
No doubt many Liberal Democrat MPs are vehemently opposed to the move, which would effectively mean the creation of a two-tier higher education system.
Thursday 21 October 2010
Labour Claims Children To Be The Worst Hit By Spending Review
http://www2.labour.org.uk/ifs-confirms-children-hit-hardest-by-spending-review
The Coalition can hardly claim that the Spending Review is fair.
Labour today claimed that children will be hit very hard.
Cameron and Clegg have already broken so many promises in their quest to bring down the budget deficit, so this should not surprise anyone.
The Coalition can hardly claim that the Spending Review is fair.
Labour today claimed that children will be hit very hard.
Cameron and Clegg have already broken so many promises in their quest to bring down the budget deficit, so this should not surprise anyone.
Chancellor's Spending Review Allows Local Government To Wield The Axe
http://www.talktalk.co.uk/news/pa/uknews/2010/10/21/cuts-will-hit-poorest-harder.htm
It was the Chancellor, George Osborne, who yesterday stood up and announced the long-awaited cuts in public spending the Coalition insist are necessary to reduce the huge budget deficit they inherited from the last Labour Government.
Local Government appear to be the hardest hit, with a huge 7% cut in the grants they will receive from Whitehall. This will mean that it will be local councils and not the Chancellor, who are each left to decide what vital services they will cut, which will undoubtedly have a devastating effect on the most vulnerable and the least well off.
George Osborne has left it to :Local Government to do the Coalition's dirty work for them. But does he really think that voters won't ultimately blame him when they start to feel the effect of these draconian cuts?
Not only that, the reductions in spending will mean as many as 490,000 public sector workers will lose their jobs over the course of this parliament.
The Conservative-led Coalition once again have been driven by doctrine and their obsession with reducing the role of the state.
And in fact, some business leaders have said that by reducing the public sector so quickly and so drastically, this could in reality have a very detrimental effect on the private sector.
Stephen Alambritis, of the Federation of Small Businesses, has said that the spending cuts annouced by the Chancellor could actually be counter-productive. Speaking in an interview with the BBC, he said that for every 100,000 jobs that will be lost in the public sector in the next few years, 60,000 will go in the private sector.
So far from being a recipe for promoting continued economic recovery, these spending cuts will surely lead us into a double-dip recession.
History has shown us that that is exactly what will happen.
It was the Chancellor, George Osborne, who yesterday stood up and announced the long-awaited cuts in public spending the Coalition insist are necessary to reduce the huge budget deficit they inherited from the last Labour Government.
Local Government appear to be the hardest hit, with a huge 7% cut in the grants they will receive from Whitehall. This will mean that it will be local councils and not the Chancellor, who are each left to decide what vital services they will cut, which will undoubtedly have a devastating effect on the most vulnerable and the least well off.
George Osborne has left it to :Local Government to do the Coalition's dirty work for them. But does he really think that voters won't ultimately blame him when they start to feel the effect of these draconian cuts?
Not only that, the reductions in spending will mean as many as 490,000 public sector workers will lose their jobs over the course of this parliament.
The Conservative-led Coalition once again have been driven by doctrine and their obsession with reducing the role of the state.
And in fact, some business leaders have said that by reducing the public sector so quickly and so drastically, this could in reality have a very detrimental effect on the private sector.
Stephen Alambritis, of the Federation of Small Businesses, has said that the spending cuts annouced by the Chancellor could actually be counter-productive. Speaking in an interview with the BBC, he said that for every 100,000 jobs that will be lost in the public sector in the next few years, 60,000 will go in the private sector.
So far from being a recipe for promoting continued economic recovery, these spending cuts will surely lead us into a double-dip recession.
History has shown us that that is exactly what will happen.
Monday 18 October 2010
Alan Johnson Makes Confident Start |As Shadow Chancellor
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11565369
New Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson has made a good start in his role as Shadow Chancellor.
His first speech was very impressive.
It will be fascinating to see him face George Osborne on Wednesday, once the much-anticipated reductions in public spending are announced by the Chancellor.
It will not be difficult for Mr Johnson to win support in the country at large as it is obvious how unpopular these spending cuts are going to be.
New Shadow Chancellor Alan Johnson has made a good start in his role as Shadow Chancellor.
His first speech was very impressive.
It will be fascinating to see him face George Osborne on Wednesday, once the much-anticipated reductions in public spending are announced by the Chancellor.
It will not be difficult for Mr Johnson to win support in the country at large as it is obvious how unpopular these spending cuts are going to be.
Saturday 16 October 2010
New Health & Safety Guidelines A Victory For Common Sense.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11546919
Regular readers will know that I am no fan of the Tories, Liberal Democrats or the Coalition.
However, like many people, I am painfully aware that the last Labour Government did make many mistakes during their thirteen years in power and there are many things that they failed to do as well.
I do believe that Labour did become health and safety-obssessed. In many areas of our everyday lives, rules were enforced at the expense of common sense.The regulations that are necessary in 'hazardous' jobs have been over-zealously applied to all other professions too and this is clearly wrong.
This was particularly the case in education. I recall hearing a case where a teacher was not able to put a plaster on a five-year old's knee without calling another member of staff into the room to act as a witness.
The emergence of the compensation culture in the UK has had a highly detrimental effect on children's development.
We have seen a big drop in school trips and other extra-curricular activities, as teachers are too frightened to take children anywhere in case there are accidents and for fear that they will be liable to pay compensation.
And adults are now frequently unwilling to take responsibility for children in other pursuits and even in simply transporting children to and from their activities.
Lord Young's review of the current health and safety legislation is therefore, a welcome step.
Of course today we live in a world where awareness of child abuse has made any adult a potential offender.
But a situation where a teacher is not allowed to physically restrain an unruly child in the classroom for fear of being labelled a paedophile is clearly unacceptable.
Therefore I also applaud the Coalition's pledge to abolish the 'no touching' rule in schools.
Labour did get it wrong on this issue and I hope that the new guidlines will allow common sense to prevail.
Regular readers will know that I am no fan of the Tories, Liberal Democrats or the Coalition.
However, like many people, I am painfully aware that the last Labour Government did make many mistakes during their thirteen years in power and there are many things that they failed to do as well.
I do believe that Labour did become health and safety-obssessed. In many areas of our everyday lives, rules were enforced at the expense of common sense.The regulations that are necessary in 'hazardous' jobs have been over-zealously applied to all other professions too and this is clearly wrong.
This was particularly the case in education. I recall hearing a case where a teacher was not able to put a plaster on a five-year old's knee without calling another member of staff into the room to act as a witness.
The emergence of the compensation culture in the UK has had a highly detrimental effect on children's development.
We have seen a big drop in school trips and other extra-curricular activities, as teachers are too frightened to take children anywhere in case there are accidents and for fear that they will be liable to pay compensation.
And adults are now frequently unwilling to take responsibility for children in other pursuits and even in simply transporting children to and from their activities.
Lord Young's review of the current health and safety legislation is therefore, a welcome step.
Of course today we live in a world where awareness of child abuse has made any adult a potential offender.
But a situation where a teacher is not allowed to physically restrain an unruly child in the classroom for fear of being labelled a paedophile is clearly unacceptable.
Therefore I also applaud the Coalition's pledge to abolish the 'no touching' rule in schools.
Labour did get it wrong on this issue and I hope that the new guidlines will allow common sense to prevail.
Wednesday 13 October 2010
Miliband Shines On PMQs Debut
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/blogs/talking_politics/terminator-miliband-ruins-cameron-p138906.html
Like many people, I was nervous about the prospect of Ed Miliband facing David Cameron across the despatch box for Prime Minister's Questions.
However, it was a very confident start. I loved the way Miliband put the Cameron in his place, telling him that he was the one who asked the questions and it was the Prime Minister who was meant to answer them.
Of course, when questioned about Child Benefit, the PM came out with the same tired old line, that the government was now having to clear up the deficit left by the last Labour government.
But the PM knows that this was a very competent start by the new Labour Leader, and the hardest PMQs he has had to contend with for a very long time.
Ed Miliband can only improve on this performance.
It won't be long before he has Cameron completely on the run.
Like many people, I was nervous about the prospect of Ed Miliband facing David Cameron across the despatch box for Prime Minister's Questions.
However, it was a very confident start. I loved the way Miliband put the Cameron in his place, telling him that he was the one who asked the questions and it was the Prime Minister who was meant to answer them.
Of course, when questioned about Child Benefit, the PM came out with the same tired old line, that the government was now having to clear up the deficit left by the last Labour government.
But the PM knows that this was a very competent start by the new Labour Leader, and the hardest PMQs he has had to contend with for a very long time.
Ed Miliband can only improve on this performance.
It won't be long before he has Cameron completely on the run.
Tuesday 12 October 2010
Browne Report Opens Door To Two-Tier Higher Education
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11519642
Lord Browne's long-awaited report into Higher Education funding has now been published.
As expected, he has recommended that the current cap on what Universities can charge students in tuition fees should be abolished.
Despite the fact that graduates will now not have to pay loans back until they are earning a salary of £21,000, an increase from the current level of £15k, there is no doubt what this change will mean.
We are heading towards a two-tier system of Higher Education; where those from lower-income backgrounds could have to settle for studying at less-well funded institutions while access to the more prestigious, better funded places will become the preserve of only the very rich.
And whilst financial help will be available for those students from the lowest-income families, it will be the middle classes that don't qualify for assistance who will lose out and most likely be put off from going on to Higher Education altogether.
Once again, as was the case with the Child Benefit fiasco, this Coalition government is hitting their core supporters the hardest and it is those in the 'squeezed middle' who will suffer most.
It will be a very sad reflection on this country if, in the years to come, one can only get a decent degree if they can afford it.
Lord Browne's long-awaited report into Higher Education funding has now been published.
As expected, he has recommended that the current cap on what Universities can charge students in tuition fees should be abolished.
Despite the fact that graduates will now not have to pay loans back until they are earning a salary of £21,000, an increase from the current level of £15k, there is no doubt what this change will mean.
We are heading towards a two-tier system of Higher Education; where those from lower-income backgrounds could have to settle for studying at less-well funded institutions while access to the more prestigious, better funded places will become the preserve of only the very rich.
And whilst financial help will be available for those students from the lowest-income families, it will be the middle classes that don't qualify for assistance who will lose out and most likely be put off from going on to Higher Education altogether.
Once again, as was the case with the Child Benefit fiasco, this Coalition government is hitting their core supporters the hardest and it is those in the 'squeezed middle' who will suffer most.
It will be a very sad reflection on this country if, in the years to come, one can only get a decent degree if they can afford it.
Sunday 10 October 2010
Ed Miliband Appeals To Disaffected Lib Dems As Clegg And Cable Ditch Promise To Oppose Tuition Fee Rise
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11510463
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11510466
During the recent General Election campaign, senior Liberal Democrat MPs - including Leader Nick Clegg and current Business Secretary Vince Cable - signed a pledge to oppose any rise in student tuition fees.
The Party campaigned for a Graduate tax instead, saying this would be fairer on those who have completed their degree studies and were looking for work.
Now, Mr Cable has gone back on his word and declared a Graduate Tax unworkable. He and Nick Clegg are likely to support the Tories and back a rise in Tuition fees.
And this comes just ahead of the publication of the Browne Report on Higher Education, which, reports say, will recommend that the current cap on student Tuition fees should be removed, thus allowing universities to charge what they like and effectively closing the door to students from less well-off backgrounds.
No wonder the Liberal Democrats grassroots are angry. Martin Shapland, of Liberal Youth said that this move would go against everything the Liberal Democrats stood for in the election.
Nick Clegg in particular made much of the need to keep Tuition fees at the level they are now.
New Labour leader Ed Miliband has been very quick to capitalise on the situation and appealed to Liberal Democrat MPs unhappy with this dramatic U-turn to support Labour in any parliamentary vote on the issue.
Once again the Liberal Democrats in the Coalition are showing that they are willing to sacrifice both their principles and their core supporters to cling onto power.
Up to now, with the public having been willing to give the Coalition a chance, Liberal Democrat MPs have been prepared to compromise with the Tories to make the arrangement work.
However, on this issue, I wonder if things might be different.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11510466
During the recent General Election campaign, senior Liberal Democrat MPs - including Leader Nick Clegg and current Business Secretary Vince Cable - signed a pledge to oppose any rise in student tuition fees.
The Party campaigned for a Graduate tax instead, saying this would be fairer on those who have completed their degree studies and were looking for work.
Now, Mr Cable has gone back on his word and declared a Graduate Tax unworkable. He and Nick Clegg are likely to support the Tories and back a rise in Tuition fees.
And this comes just ahead of the publication of the Browne Report on Higher Education, which, reports say, will recommend that the current cap on student Tuition fees should be removed, thus allowing universities to charge what they like and effectively closing the door to students from less well-off backgrounds.
No wonder the Liberal Democrats grassroots are angry. Martin Shapland, of Liberal Youth said that this move would go against everything the Liberal Democrats stood for in the election.
Nick Clegg in particular made much of the need to keep Tuition fees at the level they are now.
New Labour leader Ed Miliband has been very quick to capitalise on the situation and appealed to Liberal Democrat MPs unhappy with this dramatic U-turn to support Labour in any parliamentary vote on the issue.
Once again the Liberal Democrats in the Coalition are showing that they are willing to sacrifice both their principles and their core supporters to cling onto power.
Up to now, with the public having been willing to give the Coalition a chance, Liberal Democrat MPs have been prepared to compromise with the Tories to make the arrangement work.
However, on this issue, I wonder if things might be different.
Friday 8 October 2010
Ed Finalises His Team With Alan Johnson As Shadow Chancellor
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11499638
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/nickrobinson/2010/10/why_has_johnson.html
Ed Miliband has chosen safe pair of hands Alan Johnson as his Shadow Chancellor.
The announcement comes after much speculation over who would get the key post.
The new Labour leader has opted not to go for early favourite Ed Balls, thus avoiding any accusations that he is taking the Party to the left by having someone who has spoken up very strongly in favour of delaying spending cuts and was a prominent supporter of Gordon Brown in the last Labour Government.
This is a wise choice and shows once again that he is prepared to make bold decisions. He certainly cannot be accused of taking Labour back to the left. And Alan Johnson has a reputation for being a loyalist. He will be invaluable in taking the party's message out to the voters and persuading them to come back to Labour at the next election.
Yvette Cooper, who was also considered a strong contender for Shadow Chancellor, is now Shadow Foreign Secretary. She will no doubt be very competent in this role, but I am not sure whether it was a wise choice to give her the Women and Equalities brief as well. Foreign Affairs is a huge department, which needs someone's full attention and I think maybe the responsiblity for Women and Equalities should have been given to someone with a less demanding role - Caroline Flint, perhaps.
Shaun Woodward stays in the Shadow Cabinet as a wildcard, despite failing to make it into the top places in the MPs' ballot.
All in all, though, Labour now has a very strong and experienced team to take on the Coalition and take Labour back to power in 2015.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/nickrobinson/2010/10/why_has_johnson.html
Ed Miliband has chosen safe pair of hands Alan Johnson as his Shadow Chancellor.
The announcement comes after much speculation over who would get the key post.
The new Labour leader has opted not to go for early favourite Ed Balls, thus avoiding any accusations that he is taking the Party to the left by having someone who has spoken up very strongly in favour of delaying spending cuts and was a prominent supporter of Gordon Brown in the last Labour Government.
This is a wise choice and shows once again that he is prepared to make bold decisions. He certainly cannot be accused of taking Labour back to the left. And Alan Johnson has a reputation for being a loyalist. He will be invaluable in taking the party's message out to the voters and persuading them to come back to Labour at the next election.
Yvette Cooper, who was also considered a strong contender for Shadow Chancellor, is now Shadow Foreign Secretary. She will no doubt be very competent in this role, but I am not sure whether it was a wise choice to give her the Women and Equalities brief as well. Foreign Affairs is a huge department, which needs someone's full attention and I think maybe the responsiblity for Women and Equalities should have been given to someone with a less demanding role - Caroline Flint, perhaps.
Shaun Woodward stays in the Shadow Cabinet as a wildcard, despite failing to make it into the top places in the MPs' ballot.
All in all, though, Labour now has a very strong and experienced team to take on the Coalition and take Labour back to power in 2015.
Ed Miliband To Pick His Shadow Cabinet
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11498402
So the party has spoken. The Shadow Cabinet has been elected. There are more David Milidand supporters than expected and some surprising omissions - Ben Bradshaw, Shaun Woodward, and Peter Hain to name but a few.
Fellow leadership contender Diane Abbott unsurprisingly, also failed to make it.
This is Ed Miliband's new generation, where the Party has gone for youth over experience.
The big question is who he will pick for the key post of Shadow Chancellor. I am hoping it is not Ed Balls. He represents a strong link to the past and the conflicts of the Blair-Brown era, having been a major ally of Gordon Brown.
Yvette Cooper is the most obvious choice. She combines youth and experience and has topped the Shadow Cabinet election poll.
Ed needs a team that represents a party remaining on the centre ground. That is how elections are won.
So the party has spoken. The Shadow Cabinet has been elected. There are more David Milidand supporters than expected and some surprising omissions - Ben Bradshaw, Shaun Woodward, and Peter Hain to name but a few.
Fellow leadership contender Diane Abbott unsurprisingly, also failed to make it.
This is Ed Miliband's new generation, where the Party has gone for youth over experience.
The big question is who he will pick for the key post of Shadow Chancellor. I am hoping it is not Ed Balls. He represents a strong link to the past and the conflicts of the Blair-Brown era, having been a major ally of Gordon Brown.
Yvette Cooper is the most obvious choice. She combines youth and experience and has topped the Shadow Cabinet election poll.
Ed needs a team that represents a party remaining on the centre ground. That is how elections are won.
Wednesday 6 October 2010
PM's 'Call To Arms' Conference Speech The Calm Before The Storm
David Cameron today addressed the Conservative Party Conference for the first time as Prime Minister; the first occasion a Tory leader has done so as leader of this country for fourteen years.
His overriding message was, there are tough economic times ahead, but stick with us and we will get through it.
Really Mr Cameron?
Anyone from my generation who remembers 18 years of Conservative rule before 1997, can see history repeating itself.
The Prime Minister made much in his speech of the mess that Labour have left the country in after thirteen years of their misrule.
But those of us old enough have seen it all before, if not in the the thirties and fifties, but certainly the eighties: A long period of Labour in government, creating a huge budget deficit by spending money the country doesn't have. The Tories then come in and insist that the only way to clean up the country's finances is getting the budget deficit down very very quickly.
History has shown very clearly that reducing the deficit too fast by cutting public spending will actually take us back into recession, not further into recovery. That is exactly what happened in 1980-81 as a result of Thatcher's policy of reducing expenditure. I remember it like it was yesterday.
David Cameron is living in the clouds if he doesn't know that taking money out of the economy will only do a lot of damage.
The announcement by the Chancellor, of cuts to Child Benefit during the Tory Conference has not been received at all well by Party activists. They may have liked the Prime Minister's keynote speech, but many are very unhappy about the introduction of a policy that not only will hit many of them very hard but does not take combined household income into account.
I am reminded of how unpopular the Poll Tax was in the 1990s.
David Cameron knows, as do the rest of his party, that the Child Benefit changes are just a taste of things to come.
Everyone is holding their breath to see what will happen on October 20.
His overriding message was, there are tough economic times ahead, but stick with us and we will get through it.
Really Mr Cameron?
Anyone from my generation who remembers 18 years of Conservative rule before 1997, can see history repeating itself.
The Prime Minister made much in his speech of the mess that Labour have left the country in after thirteen years of their misrule.
But those of us old enough have seen it all before, if not in the the thirties and fifties, but certainly the eighties: A long period of Labour in government, creating a huge budget deficit by spending money the country doesn't have. The Tories then come in and insist that the only way to clean up the country's finances is getting the budget deficit down very very quickly.
History has shown very clearly that reducing the deficit too fast by cutting public spending will actually take us back into recession, not further into recovery. That is exactly what happened in 1980-81 as a result of Thatcher's policy of reducing expenditure. I remember it like it was yesterday.
David Cameron is living in the clouds if he doesn't know that taking money out of the economy will only do a lot of damage.
The announcement by the Chancellor, of cuts to Child Benefit during the Tory Conference has not been received at all well by Party activists. They may have liked the Prime Minister's keynote speech, but many are very unhappy about the introduction of a policy that not only will hit many of them very hard but does not take combined household income into account.
I am reminded of how unpopular the Poll Tax was in the 1990s.
David Cameron knows, as do the rest of his party, that the Child Benefit changes are just a taste of things to come.
Everyone is holding their breath to see what will happen on October 20.
Monday 4 October 2010
Why The Coalition's Benefit Cut Plans Are Unfair
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11464300
The Chancellor, George Osborne has announced that Child Benefit will no longer be paid to families where one parent is earning £44,000 or more.
This is an inherently unfair change, because if both parents' combined earnings are more than this, they will not be affected.
My view is that universal benefits should not be touched at all, but if the Coalition was going to reduce Child Benefit, then they should have made the threshold much higher and applied the cut in payments only to those parents earning more than £60000.
This measure will hit middle-income families very hard and will cost the Conservatives a lot of support. And it will not please many Liberal Democrats, who passed a motion at their Conference arguing against any cuts to Child Benefit.
With more cuts on the way, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
The Chancellor, George Osborne has announced that Child Benefit will no longer be paid to families where one parent is earning £44,000 or more.
This is an inherently unfair change, because if both parents' combined earnings are more than this, they will not be affected.
My view is that universal benefits should not be touched at all, but if the Coalition was going to reduce Child Benefit, then they should have made the threshold much higher and applied the cut in payments only to those parents earning more than £60000.
This measure will hit middle-income families very hard and will cost the Conservatives a lot of support. And it will not please many Liberal Democrats, who passed a motion at their Conference arguing against any cuts to Child Benefit.
With more cuts on the way, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Sunday 3 October 2010
Why Baroness Warsi Is Wrong About Labour's Policies Towards Ethnic Minorities
http://www.labourlist.org/tulip-siddiq-the-pessimism-of-baroness-warsi
Prime Minister David Cameron today tried to inject some positive spin on the effect the imminent cuts in public spending will have on the worse off in our country.
Speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, he tried to allay people's fears by saying that the cuts won't be as bad as the public think.
Compare this tone with that of the speech from Sayeeda Warsi, the Party Chairman who struck completely the opposite note.
Her speech attacking Labour's record in helping ethnic minorities showed that the PM is saying one thing and members of his cabinet are saying another.
I respect Baroness Warsi.
She is one of the few politicians who is not afraid to say exactly what she thinks.
However, in her opening speech to this year's Conservative Party conference - the Party's first in government for 14 years - Baroness Warsi accuses Labour, whilst in power, of not looking after ethnic minorities in general and the Asian community in particular.
By saying this, the Conservative Party Chairman is actually being very divisive. Such negative comments will only serve to make the Asian community feel even more alienated from the rest of the British population than some do already.
Baroness Warsi is now in government. The negative rhetoric that may be acceptable whilst in opposition, will no longer sit easily with people looking to her to take the lead.
I would like to see some positive suggestions from the Conservative Party on how to further bridge differences between people of various backgrounds.
After all, isn’t this Coalition supposed to be working in the national interest?
Prime Minister David Cameron today tried to inject some positive spin on the effect the imminent cuts in public spending will have on the worse off in our country.
Speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, he tried to allay people's fears by saying that the cuts won't be as bad as the public think.
Compare this tone with that of the speech from Sayeeda Warsi, the Party Chairman who struck completely the opposite note.
Her speech attacking Labour's record in helping ethnic minorities showed that the PM is saying one thing and members of his cabinet are saying another.
I respect Baroness Warsi.
She is one of the few politicians who is not afraid to say exactly what she thinks.
However, in her opening speech to this year's Conservative Party conference - the Party's first in government for 14 years - Baroness Warsi accuses Labour, whilst in power, of not looking after ethnic minorities in general and the Asian community in particular.
By saying this, the Conservative Party Chairman is actually being very divisive. Such negative comments will only serve to make the Asian community feel even more alienated from the rest of the British population than some do already.
Baroness Warsi is now in government. The negative rhetoric that may be acceptable whilst in opposition, will no longer sit easily with people looking to her to take the lead.
I would like to see some positive suggestions from the Conservative Party on how to further bridge differences between people of various backgrounds.
After all, isn’t this Coalition supposed to be working in the national interest?
So It's Ed....What Now For Labour In The Quest To Regain Power?
Ed Miliband is now the Leader of the Labour Party.
His narrow victory over brother David has surprised many people. I did think some time ago that he might edge it, but was convinced as the results were about to be announced that David had won.
David has done the right thing in not standing for the shadow cabinet. Had he stayed there, the press and media would have scrutinised his every move and word. Labour would have not been able to get on with the business of opposing this coalition and ensuring that Labour is returned to power in 2015.
However, it is not lost on me that perhaps it might have been better for David to leave Parliament altogether.
His spat with Harriet Harman following Ed's comments during his speech condemning Blair's invasion of Iraq was clear for all to see. Moreover, The headlines of 'back-seat driver' and 'David Carps From the Sidelines' could still appear in future, knowing just how keen the Tory press are turn politics into a soap-opera.
You could be forgiven for thinking that there were just two candidates in the recent Labour Leadership contest, rather than five.
Nevertheless, Ed's main speech to the Labour Conference was very impressive. He did very well in countering the charge by the Tories and their friends in the Daily Mail that he was wholly the choice of the Trade Unions.
Such hysterial headlines calling him 'Red Ed' because he received more votes from individual Trade Union members than his brother did totally ignore the fact that only a very small percentage of them actually voted. I was impressed with his plea to the media to engage in a more mature discussion about the issues that really matter to people.
Whilst the speech was by comparison with previous leaders' addresses, quite long, lasting an hour, I thought it was important that Ed introduced himself to the voters, having only had a very junior cabinet post in the previous Labour Government.
So what now for Labour?
The overwhelming feeling from attending their Party Conference in Manchester is, that, yes, it is disappointing to be back in Opposition after 13 years of power. However, as Harriet Harman said in her address to Delagates, Labour is 'fortified' and united in the belief that the focus should be on fighting the spending cuts of the coalition and not turning on each other. Those members who can remember 18 long years of opposition before Blair's stunning victory in 1997, will not want Labour to stay out of power for too long.
Labour needs to focus on the fact that, despite all the work David Cameron did to change the Tory Party since becoming their leader, he was unable to win a majority for them.
That says a lot.
Ed Miiband has the youth, energy and charisma to inspire people. I have seen him on the hustings during the leadership campaign and he has the ability to win back the millions of voters Labour has lost since 1997.
Labour have elected someone who, I believe, has the nous to wrong-foot Cameron at PMQs.
And as for the Liberal Democrats, they may be enjoying a taste of power for the first time in nearly seventy years, but they know they are the junior partners in this coalition. Nick Clegg and his lackies have abandoned just about every principle they held just to be in government.
Their supporters did not vote for this and the Party will be punished for it. My guess is the Liberal Democrats are now finished for a generation. Those voters who backed Nick Clegg's opposition to immediate cuts in public spending during the election campaign will undoubtedly come over to Labour, who is now the only main party on the side of the poorest in our society, as they are the ones who will be hit hardest by these cuts.
As long as Labour remains united and keeps their nerve, they should only have to endure a short spell in opposition. Come October 20 and the announcements of where the spending axe will fall, this ConDem Coalition will have an impossible task in recovering their popularity in time to prevent Labour from returning to power in 2015.
His narrow victory over brother David has surprised many people. I did think some time ago that he might edge it, but was convinced as the results were about to be announced that David had won.
David has done the right thing in not standing for the shadow cabinet. Had he stayed there, the press and media would have scrutinised his every move and word. Labour would have not been able to get on with the business of opposing this coalition and ensuring that Labour is returned to power in 2015.
However, it is not lost on me that perhaps it might have been better for David to leave Parliament altogether.
His spat with Harriet Harman following Ed's comments during his speech condemning Blair's invasion of Iraq was clear for all to see. Moreover, The headlines of 'back-seat driver' and 'David Carps From the Sidelines' could still appear in future, knowing just how keen the Tory press are turn politics into a soap-opera.
You could be forgiven for thinking that there were just two candidates in the recent Labour Leadership contest, rather than five.
Nevertheless, Ed's main speech to the Labour Conference was very impressive. He did very well in countering the charge by the Tories and their friends in the Daily Mail that he was wholly the choice of the Trade Unions.
Such hysterial headlines calling him 'Red Ed' because he received more votes from individual Trade Union members than his brother did totally ignore the fact that only a very small percentage of them actually voted. I was impressed with his plea to the media to engage in a more mature discussion about the issues that really matter to people.
Whilst the speech was by comparison with previous leaders' addresses, quite long, lasting an hour, I thought it was important that Ed introduced himself to the voters, having only had a very junior cabinet post in the previous Labour Government.
So what now for Labour?
The overwhelming feeling from attending their Party Conference in Manchester is, that, yes, it is disappointing to be back in Opposition after 13 years of power. However, as Harriet Harman said in her address to Delagates, Labour is 'fortified' and united in the belief that the focus should be on fighting the spending cuts of the coalition and not turning on each other. Those members who can remember 18 long years of opposition before Blair's stunning victory in 1997, will not want Labour to stay out of power for too long.
Labour needs to focus on the fact that, despite all the work David Cameron did to change the Tory Party since becoming their leader, he was unable to win a majority for them.
That says a lot.
Ed Miiband has the youth, energy and charisma to inspire people. I have seen him on the hustings during the leadership campaign and he has the ability to win back the millions of voters Labour has lost since 1997.
Labour have elected someone who, I believe, has the nous to wrong-foot Cameron at PMQs.
And as for the Liberal Democrats, they may be enjoying a taste of power for the first time in nearly seventy years, but they know they are the junior partners in this coalition. Nick Clegg and his lackies have abandoned just about every principle they held just to be in government.
Their supporters did not vote for this and the Party will be punished for it. My guess is the Liberal Democrats are now finished for a generation. Those voters who backed Nick Clegg's opposition to immediate cuts in public spending during the election campaign will undoubtedly come over to Labour, who is now the only main party on the side of the poorest in our society, as they are the ones who will be hit hardest by these cuts.
As long as Labour remains united and keeps their nerve, they should only have to endure a short spell in opposition. Come October 20 and the announcements of where the spending axe will fall, this ConDem Coalition will have an impossible task in recovering their popularity in time to prevent Labour from returning to power in 2015.
Saturday 25 September 2010
Calls Grow For Labour To Adopt One Member One Vote In Leadership Elections
As we wait for the announcement today as to who the next leader of the Labour Party will be, there have been calls to change the system by which the holder of the top job is chosen.
Leadership candidate Andy Burnham has been amongst those calling for a change from the present system to One Member, One Vote.
And I agree.
Is it right that someone who is a member of the Party and also belongs to a number of trade unions should have several votes whilst others have just one?
That's hardly democratic.
Jack Dromey, for example, has been a union leader for many years as well as Party Treasurer, so he has more than one vote.
We need to move away from this out-dated method of choosing the Labour Party leader.
I hope whoever is elected today will heed this call and promise to do just that.
Leadership candidate Andy Burnham has been amongst those calling for a change from the present system to One Member, One Vote.
And I agree.
Is it right that someone who is a member of the Party and also belongs to a number of trade unions should have several votes whilst others have just one?
That's hardly democratic.
Jack Dromey, for example, has been a union leader for many years as well as Party Treasurer, so he has more than one vote.
We need to move away from this out-dated method of choosing the Labour Party leader.
I hope whoever is elected today will heed this call and promise to do just that.
Thursday 23 September 2010
Public Sector Union To Challenge Coalition NHS Revamp
The Public sector union, Unison is to mount a legal challenge against the changes to the NHS proposed by the Coalition government.
It is impossible to say whether the case will succeed, but it is right that an attempt should be made to halt the proposals, which would mean yet another restructuring of the NHS just a few years after the last one.
And as one union official put it, the plans are driven by the Tory idea that the market knows best, rather than what will benefit patients.
It is impossible to say whether the case will succeed, but it is right that an attempt should be made to halt the proposals, which would mean yet another restructuring of the NHS just a few years after the last one.
And as one union official put it, the plans are driven by the Tory idea that the market knows best, rather than what will benefit patients.
Tuesday 21 September 2010
Clegg's Conference Speech Highlights Lib Dem Opportunism At The Expense Of Principle
Much of Nick Clegg's address to Liberal Democrat activists at their Party Conference could have been easily predicted.
The economic mess that the Coalition Government inherited from Labour was a theme that he exploited to the full. Inevitable of course, but given the fact that his initial instinct had been to try and form a rainbow coalition with Labour and was against the speed at which the Conservatives were planning to make cuts in public spending, this was quite significant.
But what stood out for me was the way in which the Deputy Prime Minister continually drove home the message that, despite his and the Party's misgivings about working with the Conservatives, this was a chance for the Liberal Democrats to be part of Government for the first time in decades and implement many policies that members held dear, such as electoral reform.
Mr Clegg's view, understandably, was that the Party had to take this chance of being in power. But to me this seemed to be a price worth paying, no matter how many of the Liberal Democrats' more left-leaning principles were abandoned by the wayside to accomodate their more senior Conservative partners.
Of course, the outright dissent and rebellion that had been predicted from Party members by some quarters of the media did not materialise.
There have been some calls from Party members to ensure that any spending cuts do not hit the poor hardest. And there was some criticism that the speech did not touch on how the Coalition would help the least well-off in the difficult months to come.
But the reaction to the speech from delegates was largely warm and appreciative. They responded to its conclusion with a sustained standing ovation.
However, Nick Clegg knows, as does David Cameron, that this is the calm before the storm.
Will the Liberal Democrat grassroots really remain as loyal when they begin to feel the effect of the huge spending cuts that will be announced by Mr Clegg's Coalition in just a few weeks time?
I am not so sure.
The economic mess that the Coalition Government inherited from Labour was a theme that he exploited to the full. Inevitable of course, but given the fact that his initial instinct had been to try and form a rainbow coalition with Labour and was against the speed at which the Conservatives were planning to make cuts in public spending, this was quite significant.
But what stood out for me was the way in which the Deputy Prime Minister continually drove home the message that, despite his and the Party's misgivings about working with the Conservatives, this was a chance for the Liberal Democrats to be part of Government for the first time in decades and implement many policies that members held dear, such as electoral reform.
Mr Clegg's view, understandably, was that the Party had to take this chance of being in power. But to me this seemed to be a price worth paying, no matter how many of the Liberal Democrats' more left-leaning principles were abandoned by the wayside to accomodate their more senior Conservative partners.
Of course, the outright dissent and rebellion that had been predicted from Party members by some quarters of the media did not materialise.
There have been some calls from Party members to ensure that any spending cuts do not hit the poor hardest. And there was some criticism that the speech did not touch on how the Coalition would help the least well-off in the difficult months to come.
But the reaction to the speech from delegates was largely warm and appreciative. They responded to its conclusion with a sustained standing ovation.
However, Nick Clegg knows, as does David Cameron, that this is the calm before the storm.
Will the Liberal Democrat grassroots really remain as loyal when they begin to feel the effect of the huge spending cuts that will be announced by Mr Clegg's Coalition in just a few weeks time?
I am not so sure.
Sunday 19 September 2010
Will The Lib Dem Conference Be Trouble-Free For Clegg?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11347449
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg is clearly hoping that the highly stage-managed Liberal Democrat Conference will prove controversy-free.
Yes, it is true that many of the Lib Dem councillors attending this week's gathering in Liverpool will be used to coalition politics at local level.
And granted, the Liberal Democrats are in power for the first time in many decades.
However, there is clearly much disquiet on the backbenches regarding the huge spending cuts to come in October.
I am not convinced that activists will waste this opportunity to voice their concerns about the direction in which the coalition is travelling and give Clegg an easy ride.
Will they really wait until the outcome of next May's referendum on changing the electoral system to the Alternative Vote to turn their backs on the coalition?
This week should be very interesting indeed.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg is clearly hoping that the highly stage-managed Liberal Democrat Conference will prove controversy-free.
Yes, it is true that many of the Lib Dem councillors attending this week's gathering in Liverpool will be used to coalition politics at local level.
And granted, the Liberal Democrats are in power for the first time in many decades.
However, there is clearly much disquiet on the backbenches regarding the huge spending cuts to come in October.
I am not convinced that activists will waste this opportunity to voice their concerns about the direction in which the coalition is travelling and give Clegg an easy ride.
Will they really wait until the outcome of next May's referendum on changing the electoral system to the Alternative Vote to turn their backs on the coalition?
This week should be very interesting indeed.
Wednesday 15 September 2010
Harman Takes Last PMQs
Harriet Harman has had her last PMQs as Acting Labour Leader.
The next time David Cameron is questioned at the despatch box it will be the responsibility of the new leader, widely expected to be one of the Miliband brothers.
Ms Harman has had a very long frontbench career, both in opposition and government.
In my estimation, although perhaps not with quite enough aggression needed to unnerve the other side, Ms Harman has performed competently.
In response to the Prime Minister's warm words to her, she gave a truly memorable reply:
'I'm glad I'm not wearing a hoodie!'
Whoever succeeds her will need to use all their skills and experience to wrong-foot Mr Cameron and pull this coalition apart.
The next time David Cameron is questioned at the despatch box it will be the responsibility of the new leader, widely expected to be one of the Miliband brothers.
Ms Harman has had a very long frontbench career, both in opposition and government.
In my estimation, although perhaps not with quite enough aggression needed to unnerve the other side, Ms Harman has performed competently.
In response to the Prime Minister's warm words to her, she gave a truly memorable reply:
'I'm glad I'm not wearing a hoodie!'
Whoever succeeds her will need to use all their skills and experience to wrong-foot Mr Cameron and pull this coalition apart.
Sunday 12 September 2010
Ed Miliband Pulls Ahead Of David In Latest Labour Leadership Poll
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE68B0ID20100912
As the unveiling of the new leader of the Labour Party draws closer, the latest poll shows Ed Miliband taking a narrow lead over his brother David, who has been favourite to succeed Gordon Brown since the start of the race.
The suggestion is that, with enough second preference votes, the younger Miliband brother could snatch victory at the last minute.
It is David, however, with his much wider experience in government, who is still considered the candidate most likely to beat the Tories at the next election and remains the bookie's favourite to win the contest.
This leadership election is turning out to be much closer than many anticipated.
Despite being impressed with Ed's performance in the initial stages of the campaign, I still predict that David will emerge as the new Labour leader come September 25.
As the unveiling of the new leader of the Labour Party draws closer, the latest poll shows Ed Miliband taking a narrow lead over his brother David, who has been favourite to succeed Gordon Brown since the start of the race.
The suggestion is that, with enough second preference votes, the younger Miliband brother could snatch victory at the last minute.
It is David, however, with his much wider experience in government, who is still considered the candidate most likely to beat the Tories at the next election and remains the bookie's favourite to win the contest.
This leadership election is turning out to be much closer than many anticipated.
Despite being impressed with Ed's performance in the initial stages of the campaign, I still predict that David will emerge as the new Labour leader come September 25.
Friday 10 September 2010
Privatisation Of Royal Mail Announced
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11258649
Business Secretary Vince Cable has today announced the Coalition's decision to press ahead with the privatisation of the Royal Mail.
This is something that has been mooted for a while, but has never been actioned. It is an appalling decision, and will no doubt lead to thousands of job losses and a complete fragmentation of the service.
Whatever the shortcomings of the Royal Mail, putting it into private hands, will mean that profit will come before delivery of service and the people will suffer. No doubt we will see a huge increase in the cost of sending letters and parcels.
What is even worse is Margaret Thatcher, who set about privatising every industry in sight, was very much against doing the same with the Royal Mail when she was Prime Minister. She accepted that taking the postal service out of the public service would be far too complex a process and it was best left alone.
This Coalition is proving to be far more reactionary than Thatcher's government at every turn.
Business Secretary Vince Cable has today announced the Coalition's decision to press ahead with the privatisation of the Royal Mail.
This is something that has been mooted for a while, but has never been actioned. It is an appalling decision, and will no doubt lead to thousands of job losses and a complete fragmentation of the service.
Whatever the shortcomings of the Royal Mail, putting it into private hands, will mean that profit will come before delivery of service and the people will suffer. No doubt we will see a huge increase in the cost of sending letters and parcels.
What is even worse is Margaret Thatcher, who set about privatising every industry in sight, was very much against doing the same with the Royal Mail when she was Prime Minister. She accepted that taking the postal service out of the public service would be far too complex a process and it was best left alone.
This Coalition is proving to be far more reactionary than Thatcher's government at every turn.
Oona's Warnings About Boris Hit Just The Right Note
http://oona4mayor.com/site/oonas-blog-friday-10-september/
Oona King's latest blog post really brings it home just how little Boris Johnson has done for London as Mayor.
The news that he has decided to seek re-election will disappoint all those who view him simply as Cameron's puppet.
Having broken many promises to improve the lives of the people of London, a second term of Boris Johnson as mayor will be a disaster for all the people of this great city.
Oona King's latest blog post really brings it home just how little Boris Johnson has done for London as Mayor.
The news that he has decided to seek re-election will disappoint all those who view him simply as Cameron's puppet.
Having broken many promises to improve the lives of the people of London, a second term of Boris Johnson as mayor will be a disaster for all the people of this great city.
Monday 6 September 2010
Gillard Remains Australian PM With Independents' Backing
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11209560
Julia Gillard has clung onto power in Australia by the narrowest of margins.
After weeks of negotiations, two of the three independent MPs decided to support Ms Gillard remaining as Prime Minister despite a strong showing by the opposition Liberal coalition.
However, with a majority of just one seat, it will be difficult for the Labor Party to govern entirely on their own terms and dictate the political agenda.
Julia Gillard has a tough road ahead of her.
I wouldn't bet against there being yet another general election in Australia within the next twelve months.
Julia Gillard has clung onto power in Australia by the narrowest of margins.
After weeks of negotiations, two of the three independent MPs decided to support Ms Gillard remaining as Prime Minister despite a strong showing by the opposition Liberal coalition.
However, with a majority of just one seat, it will be difficult for the Labor Party to govern entirely on their own terms and dictate the political agenda.
Julia Gillard has a tough road ahead of her.
I wouldn't bet against there being yet another general election in Australia within the next twelve months.
Sunday 5 September 2010
Blair Reveals Frustration With Brown In Memoirs
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/tony-blair/7974867/Tony-Blair-Gordon-Brown-had-zero-emotional-intelligence.html
With the publication of his long-awaited memoirs, Tony Blair has revealed what most people already knew; that his relationship with Chancellor Gordon Brown was at times extremely difficult and that Brown could be 'maddenng'.
There is no doubt that Gordon Brown was not as media-savvy as his predecessor and that he did make some big mistakes; most notably hinting that he might call a General Election soon after taking office and then when he had decided not to call one, not then moving swiftly to kill off all the media speculation as to when it might be.
Then of course there was the disastrous encounter with Gillian Duffy during the election campaign itself. Enough said.
However, I have met Gordon Brown on many occasions and, despite his political failings, have found him, in private, to be warm and affable; totally different to the awkward persona he has often presented to the media.
This is not a man who can be described as having 'zero emotional intelligence'. One only has to look at him and his wife Sarah together to see how affectionate he can be.
With the publication of his long-awaited memoirs, Tony Blair has revealed what most people already knew; that his relationship with Chancellor Gordon Brown was at times extremely difficult and that Brown could be 'maddenng'.
There is no doubt that Gordon Brown was not as media-savvy as his predecessor and that he did make some big mistakes; most notably hinting that he might call a General Election soon after taking office and then when he had decided not to call one, not then moving swiftly to kill off all the media speculation as to when it might be.
Then of course there was the disastrous encounter with Gillian Duffy during the election campaign itself. Enough said.
However, I have met Gordon Brown on many occasions and, despite his political failings, have found him, in private, to be warm and affable; totally different to the awkward persona he has often presented to the media.
This is not a man who can be described as having 'zero emotional intelligence'. One only has to look at him and his wife Sarah together to see how affectionate he can be.
Monday 30 August 2010
Time For Mandelson To Pass The Baton On Gracefully
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11127658
I think Peter Mandelson should be given credit where credit is due; he was highly instrumental in bringing Labour out of the wilderness to victory in 1997.
However, it is now time to allow the next generation to decide the next stage in the Party's future. To me, there is no sense in still attempting to cling on to the distinction between 'Old' and 'New' Labour.
Both Ed and David Miliband have spoken of the need to reconnect with Labour's core supporters and focus on why they have lost so many voters since 1997.
The Party needs someone who can get their message across effectively and take this dreadful coalition to task in the best possible way.
So far, to me, it is Ed Miliband who seems to have the qualities required to return Labour to power at the next election.
Lord Mandelson's latest comments are unhelpful and will only give fuel to the fire of a scandal-hungry press anxious to turn the Leadership contest into a duel between personalities, rather than a healthy discussion about the future direction of the Labour Party and how they can get back into Government when the UK next goes to the polls.
It is time for him to step aside gracefully and give others a chance to have their say.
I think Peter Mandelson should be given credit where credit is due; he was highly instrumental in bringing Labour out of the wilderness to victory in 1997.
However, it is now time to allow the next generation to decide the next stage in the Party's future. To me, there is no sense in still attempting to cling on to the distinction between 'Old' and 'New' Labour.
Both Ed and David Miliband have spoken of the need to reconnect with Labour's core supporters and focus on why they have lost so many voters since 1997.
The Party needs someone who can get their message across effectively and take this dreadful coalition to task in the best possible way.
So far, to me, it is Ed Miliband who seems to have the qualities required to return Labour to power at the next election.
Lord Mandelson's latest comments are unhelpful and will only give fuel to the fire of a scandal-hungry press anxious to turn the Leadership contest into a duel between personalities, rather than a healthy discussion about the future direction of the Labour Party and how they can get back into Government when the UK next goes to the polls.
It is time for him to step aside gracefully and give others a chance to have their say.
Sunday 29 August 2010
Scrapping NHS Direct A Betrayal Of The Electorate
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11120853
Well, so much for David Cameron's promises to protect the National Health Service!
The electorate were told during this year's Election campaign that health spending would be ring-fenced and protected from the huge cuts in spending being unleashed on other government departments.
Now the Coalition has announced that the service allowing patients to ring medically-qualified professionals for advice after-hours is being scrapped to save money. And they choose to do this during the summer recess, giving Parliament no opportunity to immediately debate the issues.
A most cynical move that has stunned and upset many voters who have have benefitted from the service. The Coalition can hardly say that this does not amount to cuts in spending on the NHS.
NHS Direct was introduced by the Labour Government in 1998 and has proved immensely popular with people worried about a problem out of hours; able to seek advice without having to wait for hours in A & E at their local hospital to see a doctor or nurse.
Now it is going to be replaced with the new '111' service which will in the main, be staffed by people with only limited medical training.
Former Labour Deputy Prime Minister Lord Prescott has been extremely quick in lauching an online petition to save NHS Direct.
There is no doubt that the Coalition is looking for ways in which to save money, but to scrap NHS Direct will undoubtedly put patients' lives at risk, despite what some doctors may say.
This Coalition is hell-bent on wrecking the NHS.
First we had a string of proposals for yet another restructuring of the NHS that it does not need. Now a popular, well-run service is being abolished.
The Coalition have allowed the public some say in what local services should be cut as government spending is reduced in an attempt to bring down the huge Budget deficit we face.
Why haven't the voters been consulted over scrapping NHS Direct?
When David Cameron says that he cares passionately about the NHS, it will be impossible in future to believe a single word he says.
This is an act of total vandalism by a government that has lied to the British people.
Well, so much for David Cameron's promises to protect the National Health Service!
The electorate were told during this year's Election campaign that health spending would be ring-fenced and protected from the huge cuts in spending being unleashed on other government departments.
Now the Coalition has announced that the service allowing patients to ring medically-qualified professionals for advice after-hours is being scrapped to save money. And they choose to do this during the summer recess, giving Parliament no opportunity to immediately debate the issues.
A most cynical move that has stunned and upset many voters who have have benefitted from the service. The Coalition can hardly say that this does not amount to cuts in spending on the NHS.
NHS Direct was introduced by the Labour Government in 1998 and has proved immensely popular with people worried about a problem out of hours; able to seek advice without having to wait for hours in A & E at their local hospital to see a doctor or nurse.
Now it is going to be replaced with the new '111' service which will in the main, be staffed by people with only limited medical training.
Former Labour Deputy Prime Minister Lord Prescott has been extremely quick in lauching an online petition to save NHS Direct.
There is no doubt that the Coalition is looking for ways in which to save money, but to scrap NHS Direct will undoubtedly put patients' lives at risk, despite what some doctors may say.
This Coalition is hell-bent on wrecking the NHS.
First we had a string of proposals for yet another restructuring of the NHS that it does not need. Now a popular, well-run service is being abolished.
The Coalition have allowed the public some say in what local services should be cut as government spending is reduced in an attempt to bring down the huge Budget deficit we face.
Why haven't the voters been consulted over scrapping NHS Direct?
When David Cameron says that he cares passionately about the NHS, it will be impossible in future to believe a single word he says.
This is an act of total vandalism by a government that has lied to the British people.
Friday 27 August 2010
New Growth Figures Vindication Of Labour's Policy On Reducing Deficit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11106408
http://www.labourlist.org/the-growth-deniers---ed-balls-full-speech?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2892+Communication%2C+Fri+27th+Aug+2010&tmtid=34920-2892-6-1-1297
The growth figures published today show that Labour's policy of not cutting the Budget deficit too quickly and pumping large amounts of money into to the economy has paid off.
Ed Balls, the Shadow Education Secretary, claimed today that the figures are vindication that Labour's economic strategy during their last months in office was working and that the huge cuts in public spending proposed now by the Coalition will inevitably reverse any progress that has been made.
The long, slow march towards an inevitable double-dip recession continues on its way.
http://www.labourlist.org/the-growth-deniers---ed-balls-full-speech?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2892+Communication%2C+Fri+27th+Aug+2010&tmtid=34920-2892-6-1-1297
The growth figures published today show that Labour's policy of not cutting the Budget deficit too quickly and pumping large amounts of money into to the economy has paid off.
Ed Balls, the Shadow Education Secretary, claimed today that the figures are vindication that Labour's economic strategy during their last months in office was working and that the huge cuts in public spending proposed now by the Coalition will inevitably reverse any progress that has been made.
The long, slow march towards an inevitable double-dip recession continues on its way.
Tuesday 24 August 2010
Emergency Budget Will Hit Poor Hardest
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11079496
An independent report into the Coalition's emergency Budget has suggested that the poor will be the most adversely-affected by the measures and worse off than before.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has described June's Budget as 'regressive'.
This will come as no surprise to the Labour Party who have said as such all along.
The Emergency Budget has been all about protecting the rich and hitting the poorest in our society.
An independent report into the Coalition's emergency Budget has suggested that the poor will be the most adversely-affected by the measures and worse off than before.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has described June's Budget as 'regressive'.
This will come as no surprise to the Labour Party who have said as such all along.
The Emergency Budget has been all about protecting the rich and hitting the poorest in our society.
Monday 23 August 2010
Ed Miliband Appeals Disaffected Lib Dems To Come Over To Labour
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11047450
In a BBC interview, :Party leadership candidate Ed Miliband has appealed to those Liberal Democrats unhappy with the policies being introduced by the Coalition to support Labour.
It was a direct message to those who had not joined the party to raise VAT and endorse massive cuts in public spending.
It follows rumours that Charles Kennedy, the former leader, was about to defect to Labour.
Despite the fact that Parliament is in recess, politics nevertheless continues to be interesting.
In a BBC interview, :Party leadership candidate Ed Miliband has appealed to those Liberal Democrats unhappy with the policies being introduced by the Coalition to support Labour.
It was a direct message to those who had not joined the party to raise VAT and endorse massive cuts in public spending.
It follows rumours that Charles Kennedy, the former leader, was about to defect to Labour.
Despite the fact that Parliament is in recess, politics nevertheless continues to be interesting.
Sunday 22 August 2010
Australia's Inconclusive Election Mirrors UK Hung Parliament Result
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11050525
Australia's inconclusive General Election result means that, for the first time in decades, the country is heading for rule by a hung parliament.
And with this year's UK election still fresh in everyone's mind, the parallels are striking.
Like in the UK, the incumbents in Australia are a Labor Government, although they have not been in power for as long as the 13 years that Labour were here.
And although Australia has not suffered from the world recession like the UK has, like David Cameron's Party, Opposition leader Tony Abbott, has the same conservative ideas on bringing down Australia's Budget deficit; namely huge cuts in public spending. He is also making similar noises about reducing the size of Government.
As is the case in the UK, the Australian people will no doubt endure a sustained period of austerity should Mr Abbott manage to form a Government. Everything rests on whether Julia Gillard's negotiations with the Greens and the four conservative-leaning independent MPs are a success.
The British people are currently on tenterhooks waiting for the Autumn spending round and the announcement on which departments will be worst hit by the imminent cuts.
If Mr Abbott does indeed become the next Prime Mininster of Australia, then the people there too will go through the same anxieties that we in Britain are currently experiencing.
We wait and see if the Labor Party can hold on to power Down Under and hope that, unlike us, Australians are not made to suffer the draconian policies of an unelected right-wing coalition.
Australia's inconclusive General Election result means that, for the first time in decades, the country is heading for rule by a hung parliament.
And with this year's UK election still fresh in everyone's mind, the parallels are striking.
Like in the UK, the incumbents in Australia are a Labor Government, although they have not been in power for as long as the 13 years that Labour were here.
And although Australia has not suffered from the world recession like the UK has, like David Cameron's Party, Opposition leader Tony Abbott, has the same conservative ideas on bringing down Australia's Budget deficit; namely huge cuts in public spending. He is also making similar noises about reducing the size of Government.
As is the case in the UK, the Australian people will no doubt endure a sustained period of austerity should Mr Abbott manage to form a Government. Everything rests on whether Julia Gillard's negotiations with the Greens and the four conservative-leaning independent MPs are a success.
The British people are currently on tenterhooks waiting for the Autumn spending round and the announcement on which departments will be worst hit by the imminent cuts.
If Mr Abbott does indeed become the next Prime Mininster of Australia, then the people there too will go through the same anxieties that we in Britain are currently experiencing.
We wait and see if the Labor Party can hold on to power Down Under and hope that, unlike us, Australians are not made to suffer the draconian policies of an unelected right-wing coalition.
Saturday 21 August 2010
Oona King Backs Ed Miliband for Labour Leader
http://www.labourlist.org/oona-king-backs-ed-miliband
Oona King, who is hoping to be Labour's candidate for the next Mayor of London, has declared her support for Ed Miliband as the new leader of the Labour Party.
This will come as a welcome boost to the younger of the two Miliband brothers, whose march to the Leadership of the Labour Party now seems unstoppable.
Oona King, who is hoping to be Labour's candidate for the next Mayor of London, has declared her support for Ed Miliband as the new leader of the Labour Party.
This will come as a welcome boost to the younger of the two Miliband brothers, whose march to the Leadership of the Labour Party now seems unstoppable.
Lib Dems Deny Charles Kennedy Is About To Defect To Labour
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Liberal-Democrats-Deny-Reports-That-Charles-Kennedy-Is-C
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has dismissed press rumours that former Party leader Charles Kennedy is about to defect to Labour.
Interviewed today, he brushed off the claims as part of the usual August 'silly season' when Parliament is in recess.
However with Simon Hughes already saying that Lib Dem MPs should have a veto over Coalition policies they don't like and with the spotlight of the Party Conference just weeks away, the full impact of intra-party disquiet could very soon be exposed.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has dismissed press rumours that former Party leader Charles Kennedy is about to defect to Labour.
Interviewed today, he brushed off the claims as part of the usual August 'silly season' when Parliament is in recess.
However with Simon Hughes already saying that Lib Dem MPs should have a veto over Coalition policies they don't like and with the spotlight of the Party Conference just weeks away, the full impact of intra-party disquiet could very soon be exposed.
Friday 20 August 2010
Clegg Living In Cuckoo Land As He Dismisses Damage To Lib Dems
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11037124
Does Nick Clegg really believe the Liberal Democrats have not been damaged by entering a coalition with the Conservatives?
It is clear that Labour have been the main beneficiary of Mr Clegg's Party joining the Tories in government as polls show that they have received a huge surge in members since the election in May.
And now Clegg is saying that failure to secure a new voting system will not mean the end of the Coalition. Will the Party's grassroots really be able to stomach that.
Labour leadership contender David Miliband has quite rightly said that he would not work with Clegg if there was a hung parliament after the next election.
He and his Party have sold out on so many issues that the Liberal Democrats hold dear that it would be impossible to work with them under such circumstances.
Does Nick Clegg really believe the Liberal Democrats have not been damaged by entering a coalition with the Conservatives?
It is clear that Labour have been the main beneficiary of Mr Clegg's Party joining the Tories in government as polls show that they have received a huge surge in members since the election in May.
And now Clegg is saying that failure to secure a new voting system will not mean the end of the Coalition. Will the Party's grassroots really be able to stomach that.
Labour leadership contender David Miliband has quite rightly said that he would not work with Clegg if there was a hung parliament after the next election.
He and his Party have sold out on so many issues that the Liberal Democrats hold dear that it would be impossible to work with them under such circumstances.
Wednesday 18 August 2010
Hughes Calls For Lib Dem Policy Veto As Coalition Marks 100 Days In Power
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11004127
The Liberal Democrats are calling for the right of their MPs to veto unpopular policies being proposed by the Coalition.
These are being led by new deputy leader, Simon Hughes, who has always been on the left of the party, so they won't come as a huge surprise to Westminster. And they come as the Coalition marks 100 days since taking office.
One sees a party that has spent decades on the Opposition benches abandoning all its principles having now tasted power. Opinion polls reflect how unpopular the Lib Dems now are following their agreement to share power with the Conservatives. The most recent survey has put their popularity as low as 8%.
The two parties have agreed to work together on bringing down the huge budget deficit that this country has been left with and that spending cuts are the only way forward.
However Mr Hughes' intervention begs the question of what will happen when the spending cuts start to bite and the Coalition becomes extremely unpopular, as it no doubt will.
At what point should the Lib Dems be at liberty to say no to policies they really don't like and effectively bring down the Coalition?
I am sure that it not just Mr Hughes who is asking themselves that question.
The Liberal Democrats are calling for the right of their MPs to veto unpopular policies being proposed by the Coalition.
These are being led by new deputy leader, Simon Hughes, who has always been on the left of the party, so they won't come as a huge surprise to Westminster. And they come as the Coalition marks 100 days since taking office.
One sees a party that has spent decades on the Opposition benches abandoning all its principles having now tasted power. Opinion polls reflect how unpopular the Lib Dems now are following their agreement to share power with the Conservatives. The most recent survey has put their popularity as low as 8%.
The two parties have agreed to work together on bringing down the huge budget deficit that this country has been left with and that spending cuts are the only way forward.
However Mr Hughes' intervention begs the question of what will happen when the spending cuts start to bite and the Coalition becomes extremely unpopular, as it no doubt will.
At what point should the Lib Dems be at liberty to say no to policies they really don't like and effectively bring down the Coalition?
I am sure that it not just Mr Hughes who is asking themselves that question.
Monday 16 August 2010
Ed Miliband's Campaign Continues To Build Momentum But Labour Leadership Contest Still Wide Open
http://www.labourlist.org/mark-ferguson-latest-labourlist-leadership-survey-the-results?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2879+Commun
According to this poll of Labour List readers, Ed Miliband has now overtaken his brother David as the favourite to take over as Labour leader in September.
Surprisingly, Andy Burnham seems to be doing far better than expected, and is ahead of Ed Balls, according to these findings.
It seems that this leadership election will go right down the wire.
According to this poll of Labour List readers, Ed Miliband has now overtaken his brother David as the favourite to take over as Labour leader in September.
Surprisingly, Andy Burnham seems to be doing far better than expected, and is ahead of Ed Balls, according to these findings.
It seems that this leadership election will go right down the wire.
Saturday 14 August 2010
Alan Milburn To Become Coalition's Social Mobility Tsar
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10977806
This will certainly raise a few eyebrows, following the appointment of former Labour ministers Frank Field and John Hutton as advisors on welfare reform and the fight against poverty.
What does it say about this new Coalition?
This will certainly raise a few eyebrows, following the appointment of former Labour ministers Frank Field and John Hutton as advisors on welfare reform and the fight against poverty.
What does it say about this new Coalition?
Obama Right To Support Building Of New Mosque Near Ground Zero
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/14/barack-obama-ground-zero-mosque
The decision to build a mosque and cultural centre near the site of the 9/11 attacks in New York has caused great controversy.
Relatives of those who perished in the World Trade Centre atrocity are understandably very distressed by this.
President Obama, however, has backed the plans, stating that in the United States, Muslims have as much right to a place of worship as anyone else.
And I have to agree with him.
The terrorists who caused death and mayhem on September 11 2001 did not represent the majority of peace-loving, tolerant Muslims around the world who were appalled by the tragedy.
What occurred on that fateful day was a total perversion of the cause of Islam and the perpetrators can in no way be viewed as true defenders of the Muslim faith.
Therefore building a mosque near Ground Zero should not, in my view, be seen as a victory for terrorism.
The decision to build a mosque and cultural centre near the site of the 9/11 attacks in New York has caused great controversy.
Relatives of those who perished in the World Trade Centre atrocity are understandably very distressed by this.
President Obama, however, has backed the plans, stating that in the United States, Muslims have as much right to a place of worship as anyone else.
And I have to agree with him.
The terrorists who caused death and mayhem on September 11 2001 did not represent the majority of peace-loving, tolerant Muslims around the world who were appalled by the tragedy.
What occurred on that fateful day was a total perversion of the cause of Islam and the perpetrators can in no way be viewed as true defenders of the Muslim faith.
Therefore building a mosque near Ground Zero should not, in my view, be seen as a victory for terrorism.
Thursday 12 August 2010
Full Impact Of Coalition Plans For Council Tenants Revealed
http://www.labourlist.org/jeremy-corbyn-a-cruel-nasty-and-dangerous-homes-policy?utm_source=taoma
David Cameron recently said the right to a council home for life should be scrapped. This article outlines extremely well what would happen if these proposals became law.
And as usual, the Liberal Democrat poodles in the government are not saying anything to oppose this.
David Cameron recently said the right to a council home for life should be scrapped. This article outlines extremely well what would happen if these proposals became law.
And as usual, the Liberal Democrat poodles in the government are not saying anything to oppose this.
Tuesday 10 August 2010
Ministry Of Justice Statement A Taste Of Things To Come
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10925989
The announcement from the Ministry of Justice outlining the severity of impending job cuts will not have come as a surprise.
The message of the Coalition has been clear from the start. Nearly all Government departments will have to make huge cuts in spending in order to bring down the budget deficit inherited from the previous Labour administration.
This is surely just a taste of things to come.
The full impact of Government cuts will be known on October 20, with the spending round. Then we will learn exactly where in which departments the axe will fall.
I suspect the whole of Whitehall is also holding its breath.
The announcement from the Ministry of Justice outlining the severity of impending job cuts will not have come as a surprise.
The message of the Coalition has been clear from the start. Nearly all Government departments will have to make huge cuts in spending in order to bring down the budget deficit inherited from the previous Labour administration.
This is surely just a taste of things to come.
The full impact of Government cuts will be known on October 20, with the spending round. Then we will learn exactly where in which departments the axe will fall.
I suspect the whole of Whitehall is also holding its breath.
Thursday 5 August 2010
'Klutz' Cameron's Latest Gaffe On Iran
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1300678/David-Cameron-branded-klutz-suggesting-Iran-nuclear-weapons-latest-foreign-policy-gaffe.html
It certainly doesn't get much worse than this for the Prime Minister.
Labour have branded him a 'foreign policy klutz' for his latest throw-away comments that Iran had nuclear weapons.
And now the Tory-supporting Daily Mail has jumped on the bandwagon.
Once again, Cameron is showing his political inexperience.
It certainly doesn't get much worse than this for the Prime Minister.
Labour have branded him a 'foreign policy klutz' for his latest throw-away comments that Iran had nuclear weapons.
And now the Tory-supporting Daily Mail has jumped on the bandwagon.
Once again, Cameron is showing his political inexperience.
PM's Fixed Council Tenancy Proposals Are Riddled With Flaws
http://www.labourlist.org/why-time-limiting-social-tenancies-wont-aid-mobility?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2870+Communication,+Thu+5th+Aug+2010&tmtid=33832-2870-6-1-1297
This article sets out perfectly the arguments against abolishing the right of council tenants to a home for life.
The most worrying aspect of the Prime Minister's latest big idea is that giving people council homes for only a fixed period will act as a complete disincentive to finding work. People will now be worried that if they get a job they will lose their home and be forced move in to one in the private sector and could find themselves suddenly unable to afford to pay rent.
What level of income will be deemed enough for someone to live on in the commercial market?
In my mind, these proposals will make people want to remain unemployed and have not been thought out.
David Cameron is shooting from the hip once again.
This article sets out perfectly the arguments against abolishing the right of council tenants to a home for life.
The most worrying aspect of the Prime Minister's latest big idea is that giving people council homes for only a fixed period will act as a complete disincentive to finding work. People will now be worried that if they get a job they will lose their home and be forced move in to one in the private sector and could find themselves suddenly unable to afford to pay rent.
What level of income will be deemed enough for someone to live on in the commercial market?
In my mind, these proposals will make people want to remain unemployed and have not been thought out.
David Cameron is shooting from the hip once again.
Tuesday 3 August 2010
Can Anything Else Go Wrong For This ConDem Coalition?
http://www.labourlist.org/the-so-called-schools-revolution-is-a-damp-squib
We are barely a few weeks into the life of this new Coalition and already there have been a catalogue of problems.
Within days of taking office, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, David Laws, is forced to resign because of a sex scandal.
Then we had Michael Gove's botched announcement of which schools were going to be hit by the scrapping of Labour's Building Schools for the Future scheme.
Next, the Prime Minister puts his foot in it big-time by accusing Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism, whilst on a visit to India, her most bitter political rival
Now it has become clear that very few schools want to become self-governing academies.
This Government is engaging in change for change's sake in the all the institutions that form the bedrock of British society - the NHS, Schools, the Police, with surely others to follow.
These are changes that are based on Tory dogma and a dislike of big government, rather than the benefit of the British public.
And the Liberal Democrats are following along behind like brainless poodles.
We are barely a few weeks into the life of this new Coalition and already there have been a catalogue of problems.
Within days of taking office, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, David Laws, is forced to resign because of a sex scandal.
Then we had Michael Gove's botched announcement of which schools were going to be hit by the scrapping of Labour's Building Schools for the Future scheme.
Next, the Prime Minister puts his foot in it big-time by accusing Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism, whilst on a visit to India, her most bitter political rival
Now it has become clear that very few schools want to become self-governing academies.
This Government is engaging in change for change's sake in the all the institutions that form the bedrock of British society - the NHS, Schools, the Police, with surely others to follow.
These are changes that are based on Tory dogma and a dislike of big government, rather than the benefit of the British public.
And the Liberal Democrats are following along behind like brainless poodles.
Monday 2 August 2010
Long Spell In Opposition Not A Certainty For Labour
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10827320
David Miliband struck a very sombre note at the latest hustings for the Labour leadership candidates.
Yes, it is true that the Labour Party historically has spent many long years in Opposition following certain election defeats
However, whilst Labour's share of the vote in May's election was by all accounts low, the fact that the Tories did not get an overall majority and is now very precariously sharing power with a party that has more in common with Labour than them, has to mean that Labour has some cause for optimism.
Labour's defeat in the last election was in no way as catastrophic as those the party experienced in 1983 or 1987. Nor can anyone claim that they lost as badly as the Tories did in 1997.
David Miliband is right to take a very cautious line and warn the Party that they could be out of power for a long time.
But how long Labour spends on the Opposition benches will depend heavily on the new leader taking control very quickly and ensuring that the Party immediately unites behind them. As long as the Party remains disciplined and focussed, then Labour can concentrate on rebuilding itself and ensuring victory at the next election in five years time.
I believe it is definitely possible for Labour to do this.
A long spell in Opposition is by no means a certainty.
David Miliband struck a very sombre note at the latest hustings for the Labour leadership candidates.
Yes, it is true that the Labour Party historically has spent many long years in Opposition following certain election defeats
However, whilst Labour's share of the vote in May's election was by all accounts low, the fact that the Tories did not get an overall majority and is now very precariously sharing power with a party that has more in common with Labour than them, has to mean that Labour has some cause for optimism.
Labour's defeat in the last election was in no way as catastrophic as those the party experienced in 1983 or 1987. Nor can anyone claim that they lost as badly as the Tories did in 1997.
David Miliband is right to take a very cautious line and warn the Party that they could be out of power for a long time.
But how long Labour spends on the Opposition benches will depend heavily on the new leader taking control very quickly and ensuring that the Party immediately unites behind them. As long as the Party remains disciplined and focussed, then Labour can concentrate on rebuilding itself and ensuring victory at the next election in five years time.
I believe it is definitely possible for Labour to do this.
A long spell in Opposition is by no means a certainty.
Thursday 29 July 2010
PM's Unguarded Comments About Pakistan's Terrorist Links Reveal His Immaturity And Inexperience
The Prime Minister's remarks about Pakistan's association with terrorism say a great deal about him.
David Cameron's trip to India was supposed to promote better links between the two countries, but has instead caused a diplomatic spat with her Muslim neighbours.
Mr Cameron's defence that he is someone who is a straight-talker is simply lame and pathetic. He may have only been Prime Minister for a few weeks but he has been in the political spotlight for several years now as Conservative leader and should have sharper diplomatic skills.
Such provocative use of language illustrates that Cameron lacks the maturity that being in Government requires, never mind to maintain harmonious relations with other countries.
David Cameron is typical of many of his fellow MPs in the Conservative party. One could be forgiven for thinking that he actually believes that, having come from a very privileged background, it is his birthright to be Prime Minister, despite any furious protestations from him to the contrary.
But having led his party back to Government after 13 years in the wilderness of Opposition, it is shocking to see that, once in power, how gaffe-prone Cameron really is.
David Cameron's trip to India was supposed to promote better links between the two countries, but has instead caused a diplomatic spat with her Muslim neighbours.
Mr Cameron's defence that he is someone who is a straight-talker is simply lame and pathetic. He may have only been Prime Minister for a few weeks but he has been in the political spotlight for several years now as Conservative leader and should have sharper diplomatic skills.
Such provocative use of language illustrates that Cameron lacks the maturity that being in Government requires, never mind to maintain harmonious relations with other countries.
David Cameron is typical of many of his fellow MPs in the Conservative party. One could be forgiven for thinking that he actually believes that, having come from a very privileged background, it is his birthright to be Prime Minister, despite any furious protestations from him to the contrary.
But having led his party back to Government after 13 years in the wilderness of Opposition, it is shocking to see that, once in power, how gaffe-prone Cameron really is.
Monday 26 July 2010
Poll Confirms Disquiet Amongst Lib Dem Grassroots Over Coalition
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8854870.stm
The latest opinion polls confirms what many have been saying since the formation of the Coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats - that many supporters would not have backed the party if they had known they would have joined forces with the Tories in the event of a Hung Parliament.
The Liberal Democrats have always been more closely aligned with Labour so this is not surprising.
It is all very well for former leader Lord Ashdown to say that the Coalition is not a bad thing. He is not going to be affected by all the cuts in public services that will hit millions of ordinary people on modest incomes.
This survey will definitely not be the last to produce these findings.
The latest opinion polls confirms what many have been saying since the formation of the Coalition between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats - that many supporters would not have backed the party if they had known they would have joined forces with the Tories in the event of a Hung Parliament.
The Liberal Democrats have always been more closely aligned with Labour so this is not surprising.
It is all very well for former leader Lord Ashdown to say that the Coalition is not a bad thing. He is not going to be affected by all the cuts in public services that will hit millions of ordinary people on modest incomes.
This survey will definitely not be the last to produce these findings.
Sunday 25 July 2010
Police Set To Lose Impartiality Under New Coalition Plans
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10757014
A radical shake-up of the police is to be announced this week by the Home Secretary, Theresa May.
One of the proposals is to abolish the current system of independent Police Authorities and instead have elections at local level for police and crime commissioners, the first of which will be held in May 2012. The commissioners would have the power to set budgets and hire and fire Chief Constables.
However, the new plans have already provoked opposition from the Police authorities who would be scrapped under the new system.
Police Authorities have always been independent of any political influence. There is no doubt that having locally-elected officials will mean that the police will lose any impartiality that they now have.
Decisions about policing will no longer be based on what is right for an individual community. Instead, choices will now be politically-motivated.
This cannot be right.
A radical shake-up of the police is to be announced this week by the Home Secretary, Theresa May.
One of the proposals is to abolish the current system of independent Police Authorities and instead have elections at local level for police and crime commissioners, the first of which will be held in May 2012. The commissioners would have the power to set budgets and hire and fire Chief Constables.
However, the new plans have already provoked opposition from the Police authorities who would be scrapped under the new system.
Police Authorities have always been independent of any political influence. There is no doubt that having locally-elected officials will mean that the police will lose any impartiality that they now have.
Decisions about policing will no longer be based on what is right for an individual community. Instead, choices will now be politically-motivated.
This cannot be right.
Saturday 24 July 2010
David Davis' 'Brokeback Coalition' Jibe Reveals What Some MPs Really Think Of The New Government
http://www.talktalk.co.uk/news/pa/uknews/2010/07/24/tory-overheard-mocking-coalition.html?page=1
One could possibly argue that David Davis' comments may the result of sour grapes.
After all, he blew his chances of being given a cabinet post in Government when he said the owners of a bed and breakfast were right to ban gay couples if they wished; thus totally flying in the face of the Conservative Party's new, tolerant image.
Nevertheless, his derogatory remarks calling the agreement between Cameron and Clegg's parties the 'Brokeback' Coalition, however unguarded are hugely significant. They clearly reveal huge disquiet amongst Lib Dem and Conservative MPs about whether the two parties are really working well together and the direction in which the new Government is taking this country.
How many more MPs will now speak out?
One could possibly argue that David Davis' comments may the result of sour grapes.
After all, he blew his chances of being given a cabinet post in Government when he said the owners of a bed and breakfast were right to ban gay couples if they wished; thus totally flying in the face of the Conservative Party's new, tolerant image.
Nevertheless, his derogatory remarks calling the agreement between Cameron and Clegg's parties the 'Brokeback' Coalition, however unguarded are hugely significant. They clearly reveal huge disquiet amongst Lib Dem and Conservative MPs about whether the two parties are really working well together and the direction in which the new Government is taking this country.
How many more MPs will now speak out?
Thursday 22 July 2010
Labour Should Propose Credible Alternative To Cameron's Big Society
http://labourlist.org/ben-fox-big-society-economy?utm_source=taomail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2856+Communication,+Thu+22nd+Jul+2010&tmtid=33171-2856-6-1-1297
So David Cameron has relaunched his Big Society idea that appeared to flounder during the election campaign.
It will now be up to individuals to come together to run local services rather than Local Authorities or the State.
In my mind, it is simply a rehash of policies that were carried out during the Thatcher era of the 1980s - designed to undermine local government and de-centralise services. It didn't work then and it won't work now.
Whilst Labour have been very vocal in their opposition to Cameron's proposals, they need to be more proactive in coming up with alternatives to the Big Society.
So David Cameron has relaunched his Big Society idea that appeared to flounder during the election campaign.
It will now be up to individuals to come together to run local services rather than Local Authorities or the State.
In my mind, it is simply a rehash of policies that were carried out during the Thatcher era of the 1980s - designed to undermine local government and de-centralise services. It didn't work then and it won't work now.
Whilst Labour have been very vocal in their opposition to Cameron's proposals, they need to be more proactive in coming up with alternatives to the Big Society.
Wednesday 21 July 2010
Clegg's PMQs Debut Sets Him On Possible Collision Course With Tories
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10715629
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jul/21/nick-clegg-illegal-iraq-war-gaffe
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg's comments in the House of Commons that he believed the 2003 invasion of Iraq to be illegal is no real surprise.
What is controversial, however, is that he chose to make these remarks whilst standing in for David Cameron during Prime Minister's Questions.
It does not say much for the unity of the Coalition. The Guardian has branded the Government as being in 'confusion' following Mr Clegg's admission.
Given that the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats were on opposing sides when it came to voting on whether the UK should invade Iraq and with the Chilcott Enquiry into the war still in progress and yet to report its findings, the inevitable question has to be asked.
Will the coalition run into trouble over Iraq? With the Liberal Democrats so opposed to the war, can Nick Clegg really hope to carry his party in a Coalition with the Conservatives right up until 2015?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jul/21/nick-clegg-illegal-iraq-war-gaffe
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg's comments in the House of Commons that he believed the 2003 invasion of Iraq to be illegal is no real surprise.
What is controversial, however, is that he chose to make these remarks whilst standing in for David Cameron during Prime Minister's Questions.
It does not say much for the unity of the Coalition. The Guardian has branded the Government as being in 'confusion' following Mr Clegg's admission.
Given that the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats were on opposing sides when it came to voting on whether the UK should invade Iraq and with the Chilcott Enquiry into the war still in progress and yet to report its findings, the inevitable question has to be asked.
Will the coalition run into trouble over Iraq? With the Liberal Democrats so opposed to the war, can Nick Clegg really hope to carry his party in a Coalition with the Conservatives right up until 2015?
Tuesday 20 July 2010
Ed Miliband Now More Favoured Leadership Candidate After Strong Hustings Performance
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/23/ed-miliband-labour-leader-kinnock
I went to last Friday's Labour leadership hustings meeting with my mind more or less made up about who would get my vote as first preference in the forthcoming ballot.
I was not expecting to come away having altered my views on any of the candidates, having already decided, like many people, to go with David Miliband as my first choice.
However, it was his brother Ed, who was the most fluent of all the five running for the job. I was especially impressed with his closing remarks and the way he delivered them. I really felt he connected with the audience in a way that the others, including his more experienced older brother, failed to do.
In fact, I found the former foreign secretary's oratory disappointing on this occasion. I have seen him perform much better at previous meetings.
Former Labour leader, Lord Kinnock, now one of the Party's elder statesmen, said shortly after the general election that Ed Miliband has the combination of qualities required to lead Labour back to power.
I believe Kinnock is right. Not only does Ed Miliband put Labour's case across exceptionally well; he is warm, affable and engaging.
It is entirely possible, that even if his brother gets the most first preference votes, Ed will win enough second and third preferences to snatch the leadership at the last minute.
Ed Miliband has the making of a great Prime Minister and will be my first choice as the next leader of the Labour Party.
I went to last Friday's Labour leadership hustings meeting with my mind more or less made up about who would get my vote as first preference in the forthcoming ballot.
I was not expecting to come away having altered my views on any of the candidates, having already decided, like many people, to go with David Miliband as my first choice.
However, it was his brother Ed, who was the most fluent of all the five running for the job. I was especially impressed with his closing remarks and the way he delivered them. I really felt he connected with the audience in a way that the others, including his more experienced older brother, failed to do.
In fact, I found the former foreign secretary's oratory disappointing on this occasion. I have seen him perform much better at previous meetings.
Former Labour leader, Lord Kinnock, now one of the Party's elder statesmen, said shortly after the general election that Ed Miliband has the combination of qualities required to lead Labour back to power.
I believe Kinnock is right. Not only does Ed Miliband put Labour's case across exceptionally well; he is warm, affable and engaging.
It is entirely possible, that even if his brother gets the most first preference votes, Ed will win enough second and third preferences to snatch the leadership at the last minute.
Ed Miliband has the making of a great Prime Minister and will be my first choice as the next leader of the Labour Party.
Thursday 15 July 2010
Was PM Too Quick To Brand Raoul Moat A Callous Murderer?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10636086
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10641225
Like the law-abiding majority of people in this country, I was horrified and upset at the brutal shooting of three innocent people by Raoul Moat.
The fact that the days he spent on the run and evading capture ended with him killing himself, will be of no comfort to his three victims and their loved ones. Raoul Moat will never face justice in court.
I also cannot condone the messages of support that Moat has received on Facebook from people who did not know him in an attempt to propel him to some kind of hero-statuts.
David Cameron used PMQs to roundly condemn the pages on Facebook that have been set up in Moat's memory.
However is the Prime Minister really right to label Raoul Moat a 'callous murderer?'
A picture is emerging of a man with very serious mental health problems and paranoid tendancies who may not have received the attention from social services that he required. Indeed Raoul Moat himself repeatedly acknowledged that his difficulties.
And yet as his brother Angus has suggested, the appropriate help was not forthcoming and had Moat had the right support and the symptoms of his mental instability been spotted sooner, the tragic events that unfolded might been avoided.
Since Moat was already known to social services, clearly not enough attention was paid to his mental health needs. This is a very serious failing on the part of all authorities concerned.
Mr Cameron's comments are certainly not helpful. Such flippant remarks might send the right political signals to the Tory grass-roots.
However they do very little to address the very serious social and political issues that this very sad case raises.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10641225
Like the law-abiding majority of people in this country, I was horrified and upset at the brutal shooting of three innocent people by Raoul Moat.
The fact that the days he spent on the run and evading capture ended with him killing himself, will be of no comfort to his three victims and their loved ones. Raoul Moat will never face justice in court.
I also cannot condone the messages of support that Moat has received on Facebook from people who did not know him in an attempt to propel him to some kind of hero-statuts.
David Cameron used PMQs to roundly condemn the pages on Facebook that have been set up in Moat's memory.
However is the Prime Minister really right to label Raoul Moat a 'callous murderer?'
A picture is emerging of a man with very serious mental health problems and paranoid tendancies who may not have received the attention from social services that he required. Indeed Raoul Moat himself repeatedly acknowledged that his difficulties.
And yet as his brother Angus has suggested, the appropriate help was not forthcoming and had Moat had the right support and the symptoms of his mental instability been spotted sooner, the tragic events that unfolded might been avoided.
Since Moat was already known to social services, clearly not enough attention was paid to his mental health needs. This is a very serious failing on the part of all authorities concerned.
Mr Cameron's comments are certainly not helpful. Such flippant remarks might send the right political signals to the Tory grass-roots.
However they do very little to address the very serious social and political issues that this very sad case raises.
Mandelson Memoirs Reveal Clashes With Blair Over Iraq
The latest excerpts of Peter Mandelson's book, published today, show how uncertain he was about Tony Blair and George Bush's decision to invade Iraq.
He raised many concerns with the then-Prime Minister, especially in relation to rebuilding Iraq after the invasion. This caused much friction between the two men; actually leading to Blair accusing Mandelson of being influenced too much by anti-war MP George Galloway.
What Blair himself may say in his forthcoming book about this, as well other aspects of his policy towards Iraq, will be very interesting indeed.
He raised many concerns with the then-Prime Minister, especially in relation to rebuilding Iraq after the invasion. This caused much friction between the two men; actually leading to Blair accusing Mandelson of being influenced too much by anti-war MP George Galloway.
What Blair himself may say in his forthcoming book about this, as well other aspects of his policy towards Iraq, will be very interesting indeed.
Tuesday 13 July 2010
Balls Could Be Main Beneficiary Of Second Preference Votes
http://www.labourlist.org/the-diamond-candidate-has-emerged-jim-knight
Whilst I still believe that David Miliband is the candidate most likely to emerge victorious at the forthcoming election for the next Labour Party leader, we must not, as I've said before, dismiss the chances of Ed Balls.
Labour MP and former minister Jim Knight puts the case for Mr Balls very eloquently here.
The second-preference votes of the Electoral College will be absolutely crucial.
Whilst I still believe that David Miliband is the candidate most likely to emerge victorious at the forthcoming election for the next Labour Party leader, we must not, as I've said before, dismiss the chances of Ed Balls.
Labour MP and former minister Jim Knight puts the case for Mr Balls very eloquently here.
The second-preference votes of the Electoral College will be absolutely crucial.
Fallout From Mandelson's Memoirs Underlines Urgency For Labour To Present New Image
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10608577.stm
http://www.labourlist.org/time-for-a-memoir-moratorium-ben-fox
The public spat amongst former Labour cabinet ministers that resulted from the publication of Lord Mandelson's memoirs has prompted some to suggest that there should be a mandatory moratorium period during which former members of the government do not publicly criticise their colleagues in office.
Certainly, I would agree that with Labour having left government only very recently, they need to focus on the vital business of choosing a leader to take us through the 4-5 years of this parliament and not dwell on the fact that many of the Cabinet predicted that Gordon Brown would to lead Labour to defeat.
It is extremely damaging to have the political memoirs of the ex-Prime Minister and former First Secretary serialised in the newspapers right at the same time that their Party is electing a new leader.
Once again, this plays into the hands of the media and the press, who are more interested in highlighting differences between personalities who potentially may be governing us in a few years time, rather than discussing the bread-and-butter issues that really matter to the electorate.
Labour needs time to re-group and redefine itself so that it can be a credible force to defeat the Tories at the next election.
http://www.labourlist.org/time-for-a-memoir-moratorium-ben-fox
The public spat amongst former Labour cabinet ministers that resulted from the publication of Lord Mandelson's memoirs has prompted some to suggest that there should be a mandatory moratorium period during which former members of the government do not publicly criticise their colleagues in office.
Certainly, I would agree that with Labour having left government only very recently, they need to focus on the vital business of choosing a leader to take us through the 4-5 years of this parliament and not dwell on the fact that many of the Cabinet predicted that Gordon Brown would to lead Labour to defeat.
It is extremely damaging to have the political memoirs of the ex-Prime Minister and former First Secretary serialised in the newspapers right at the same time that their Party is electing a new leader.
Once again, this plays into the hands of the media and the press, who are more interested in highlighting differences between personalities who potentially may be governing us in a few years time, rather than discussing the bread-and-butter issues that really matter to the electorate.
Labour needs time to re-group and redefine itself so that it can be a credible force to defeat the Tories at the next election.
Monday 12 July 2010
The NHS Isn't Broke, So Why Fix It?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/10557996.stm
Today, the new Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley spelt out the new Coalition's plans for the NHS.
Key amongst these are allowing GPs to determine the best treatment for a patient and eventually scrapping Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities.
However, GPs are not managers; not all of them will want the extra administrative responsibilities that will come with these changes.
By the end of the recent Labour government, nobody had to wait more than 18 weeks to see a consultant, or more than two weeks for a consultation with a cancer specialist.
At a stroke, the Coalition has abolished these measures. Measures that were making our NHS better than it had ever been.
Now, without these guarantees and with no mention in the statement today of who exactly GPs will be accountable to if things go wrong, patient care is bound to suffer.
Are we now being transported back to the bad old-days of patients lying for hours on trolleys in A&E? Or patients having to wait months in pain for operations not considered to be urgent?
GPs will be allowed to buy services from private companies whose main concern will be profit rather than the well-being of the patient.
It is a return to the Thatcherite policies of the 1980s which caused untold misery to those unable to afford private healthcare.
The electorate will not welcome these changes and they will only serve to make the coalition more unpopular than it is now.
The NHS isn't broke, so let's not fix it.
Today, the new Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley spelt out the new Coalition's plans for the NHS.
Key amongst these are allowing GPs to determine the best treatment for a patient and eventually scrapping Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities.
However, GPs are not managers; not all of them will want the extra administrative responsibilities that will come with these changes.
By the end of the recent Labour government, nobody had to wait more than 18 weeks to see a consultant, or more than two weeks for a consultation with a cancer specialist.
At a stroke, the Coalition has abolished these measures. Measures that were making our NHS better than it had ever been.
Now, without these guarantees and with no mention in the statement today of who exactly GPs will be accountable to if things go wrong, patient care is bound to suffer.
Are we now being transported back to the bad old-days of patients lying for hours on trolleys in A&E? Or patients having to wait months in pain for operations not considered to be urgent?
GPs will be allowed to buy services from private companies whose main concern will be profit rather than the well-being of the patient.
It is a return to the Thatcherite policies of the 1980s which caused untold misery to those unable to afford private healthcare.
The electorate will not welcome these changes and they will only serve to make the coalition more unpopular than it is now.
The NHS isn't broke, so let's not fix it.
Mandelson Memoirs Provoke Strong Reaction Amongst Labour Hierarchy.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/also_in_the_news/8806560.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10590932.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10590932.stm
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/07/12/john-prescott-calls-for-end-to-labour-feuds-115875-22406852/
The publication of Peter Mandelson's memoirs was always going to be controversial; given the many years he and Gordon Brown were at loggerheads before he was brought back into government as Business Secretary.
Charlie Whelan, Brown's close aide immediately attacked Lord Mandelson on the publication of the book.
It follows David Miliband's criticism of Mr Brown at the weekend. The former Foreign Secretary, who refused to contest Mr Brown's succession to the Premiership in 2007 and remained publicly loyal to the latter during his time in 10 Downing Street, has now rounded on the former PM, by saying that whilst he supported Brown in all the things he pledged to do on succeeding Tony Blair, these promises were not kept.
All this has led to leading figures in the party to plead for unity. Leadership contender Andy Burnham made an impassioned plea to the party to move on from the factionalism of the Blair-Brown era. And Former Deputy PM Lord Prescott moved quickly to do the same
With the Coalition now likely to be very unpopular, following the cancellation of the BSF programme and all the spending cuts that have been confirmed, Labour absolutely must not turn in on itself.
Those of us who remember the disunity of the Party and the dark days of Opposition in the 1980s will not want to return there.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10590932.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10590932.stm
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/07/12/john-prescott-calls-for-end-to-labour-feuds-115875-22406852/
The publication of Peter Mandelson's memoirs was always going to be controversial; given the many years he and Gordon Brown were at loggerheads before he was brought back into government as Business Secretary.
Charlie Whelan, Brown's close aide immediately attacked Lord Mandelson on the publication of the book.
It follows David Miliband's criticism of Mr Brown at the weekend. The former Foreign Secretary, who refused to contest Mr Brown's succession to the Premiership in 2007 and remained publicly loyal to the latter during his time in 10 Downing Street, has now rounded on the former PM, by saying that whilst he supported Brown in all the things he pledged to do on succeeding Tony Blair, these promises were not kept.
All this has led to leading figures in the party to plead for unity. Leadership contender Andy Burnham made an impassioned plea to the party to move on from the factionalism of the Blair-Brown era. And Former Deputy PM Lord Prescott moved quickly to do the same
With the Coalition now likely to be very unpopular, following the cancellation of the BSF programme and all the spending cuts that have been confirmed, Labour absolutely must not turn in on itself.
Those of us who remember the disunity of the Party and the dark days of Opposition in the 1980s will not want to return there.
Friday 9 July 2010
Labour Accuses Coalition Of Putting Ideology Before The Economy As Osborne Consults Public Sector Workers On Cuts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10567295.stm
The Chancellor's move to meet with public sector workers and consult with them on where best to make public spending cuts - has provoked a furious response from the Unions, with both Unite and the GMB accusing George Osborne of asking millions of workers to suggest how they should be sacked.
Likewise, Labour maintain that the Coalition's huge cuts in spending are borne out of an ideological belief in the need to reduce the size of the state rather than sound economics.
And there is no doubt in my mind that asking readers of the Tory-supporting Sun newspaper to give their ideas on where cuts should be made will further legitimise the dead end to which this fledgling Coalition is leading this country.
The only question that still needs answering is how quickly we will go back in to recession.
The Chancellor's move to meet with public sector workers and consult with them on where best to make public spending cuts - has provoked a furious response from the Unions, with both Unite and the GMB accusing George Osborne of asking millions of workers to suggest how they should be sacked.
Likewise, Labour maintain that the Coalition's huge cuts in spending are borne out of an ideological belief in the need to reduce the size of the state rather than sound economics.
And there is no doubt in my mind that asking readers of the Tory-supporting Sun newspaper to give their ideas on where cuts should be made will further legitimise the dead end to which this fledgling Coalition is leading this country.
The only question that still needs answering is how quickly we will go back in to recession.
Wednesday 7 July 2010
Sir Alan Budd Quits OBR
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10518961.stm
The head of the new Office of Budget Responsibility, Sir Alan Budd, has quit after three months.
The OBR is the new government department set up by the Chancellor to oversee cuts in spending.
Even though Sir Alan was only due to stay in post for a few weeks, his departure is bound to raise a few eyebrows.
The question needs to be asked if those advising the Coalition are really happy with the vast cuts in spending that have already been announced by the Treasury and whether they support them being implemented so quickly.
The head of the new Office of Budget Responsibility, Sir Alan Budd, has quit after three months.
The OBR is the new government department set up by the Chancellor to oversee cuts in spending.
Even though Sir Alan was only due to stay in post for a few weeks, his departure is bound to raise a few eyebrows.
The question needs to be asked if those advising the Coalition are really happy with the vast cuts in spending that have already been announced by the Treasury and whether they support them being implemented so quickly.
Monday 5 July 2010
Labour's School Building Programme Scrapped As Coalition Continues To Wield The Axe
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/10514113.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jul/05/school-building-programme-budget-cuts?CMP=AFC
The Conservative-led Coalition sent the UK right back to the 1980's today, with Education Secretary Michael Gove's announcement to the House of Commons that they were scrapping Labour's schools' building programme.
We will now no doubt see a return to the Thatcher era of schools with leaking roofs and overcrowded classrooms.
It is a disgraceful step by a Coalition that built their election campaign around the need to build a better future
for our country.
By cancelling such an important scheme, both the Conservatives and their Lib Dem puppets are showing that they clearly do not care about the future generation.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/jul/05/school-building-programme-budget-cuts?CMP=AFC
The Conservative-led Coalition sent the UK right back to the 1980's today, with Education Secretary Michael Gove's announcement to the House of Commons that they were scrapping Labour's schools' building programme.
We will now no doubt see a return to the Thatcher era of schools with leaking roofs and overcrowded classrooms.
It is a disgraceful step by a Coalition that built their election campaign around the need to build a better future
for our country.
By cancelling such an important scheme, both the Conservatives and their Lib Dem puppets are showing that they clearly do not care about the future generation.
Sunday 4 July 2010
Are We Really In For 40% Spending Cuts From Government Departments?
This is the latest story in the media.
Given the horrific extent of the spending cuts already announced by the Coalition, I would like to believe Philip Hammond, the Transport Secretary, when he says such deep reductions in spending are not likely to happen.
I hope he is right. The economy would not be able to function with such cuts to the public sector.
The worst-case scenario of a double-dip recession would definitely become a reality; a situation from which it would take this country years to recover.
Given the horrific extent of the spending cuts already announced by the Coalition, I would like to believe Philip Hammond, the Transport Secretary, when he says such deep reductions in spending are not likely to happen.
I hope he is right. The economy would not be able to function with such cuts to the public sector.
The worst-case scenario of a double-dip recession would definitely become a reality; a situation from which it would take this country years to recover.
Saturday 3 July 2010
Coalition In A Mess Over Electoral Reform Vote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10483841.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10489088.stm
The key issue of electoral reform will definitely be the making or breaking of this Coalition.
What the result of the referendum - due to be held next May - will mean for the durability of this Government must, surely, be a complete unknown.
A referendum on AV, the Alternative Vote electoral system, was central to the Liberal Democrats agreeing to be part of a Government with David Cameron and the Conservatives.
However, with so many Conservative backbenchers traditionally vehemently opposed to any kind of proportional voting system, and with Mr Cameron prepared to vote against a change to the current first-past-the-post system, the survival of the Coalition, which was at best, wobbly from the start anyway, looks to be on even more shaky ground now.
With both partners in the Coalition so far apart on this issue, it is impossible to see how it can possibly survive.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10489088.stm
The key issue of electoral reform will definitely be the making or breaking of this Coalition.
What the result of the referendum - due to be held next May - will mean for the durability of this Government must, surely, be a complete unknown.
A referendum on AV, the Alternative Vote electoral system, was central to the Liberal Democrats agreeing to be part of a Government with David Cameron and the Conservatives.
However, with so many Conservative backbenchers traditionally vehemently opposed to any kind of proportional voting system, and with Mr Cameron prepared to vote against a change to the current first-past-the-post system, the survival of the Coalition, which was at best, wobbly from the start anyway, looks to be on even more shaky ground now.
With both partners in the Coalition so far apart on this issue, it is impossible to see how it can possibly survive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)